THE FAKE FRENCH TRUCK TERROR INCIDENT
Jim Stone
July 16/17/18 2016
I know about the "Baton Rouge shootings" but am staying on the following topic for another day, because it irrevocably proves the truck attack in Nice was 100 percent phony, (and therefore most likely the Baton Rouge shootings are phony.) If we are going to get anywhere on the "terror" topic, people have to see this, have it sink in, and distribute it far and wide. WE NEVER GET ANYTHING AS OBVIOUS AS THIS TO KILL LIES WITH, THEY TOTALLY BLEW IT, ARCHIVE, POST, AND CONVERT THE BLIND OVER TO THE TRUTH.
WRECKING BAR!!!!!!
NOW MORE THAN BULLET STICKERS, THEY USED A FLAT ENDED WRECKING BAR TO POKE "BULLET HOLES" IN THE METAL! ANOTHER BUST!
You can't get a clear picture of the bullet holes in the metal on the truck. I FOUND OUT WHY. It is because they were obviously poked into the metal with a wrecking bar!
ALL OF THESE "BULLET HOLES" IN THE METAL ON THE SIDE OF THE TRUCK ARE NOW PROVEN TO "SUPPOSED TO BE" STRAIGHT ON POINT BLANK SHOTS ACCORDING TO THE "SHOOT OUT" VIDEO. IN THAT VIDEO NOT A SINGLE ONE THAT HIT THE SIDE WAS FIRED FROM THE FRONT OF THE TRUCK. THERE SHOULD NOT BE ANY ELONGATED BULLET HOLES ON THE SIDE OF THE TRUCK. YET, NOT ONLY ARE THEY ELONGATED, THEY ARE ALL RECTANGULAR WITH SQUARE CORNERS. SO EITHER THE POLICE SHOOT RECTANGULAR BULLETS NOW, OR A WRECKING BAR WAS USED, THAT IS THE ONLY WAY THIS HAPPENED, AND IT EXPLAINS PERFECTLY WHY YOU CAN'T FIND ANY CRYSTAL CLEAR BULLET PICTURES OF THE SIDE OF THIS TRUCK ANYWHERE. IT ALSO EXPLAINS WHY THERE ARE NO EXIT HOLES. Despite the censorship, someone managed to get a picture of the holes that was good enough even if it was not "crystal clear".
Obvious problems with the Nice terror attack:
1. None of the video shows the truck actually hit anyone.
2. They lied about the truck going through barricades and into a "people only" area. The truck only goes down a street with existing traffic, where if people are watching out like they should, they would not get hit. And it was not going fast at all, like it would be on a death mission. The death toll could not have been this high. If he was lucky, he would have hit only one or two people even if he went full speed through red light crosswalks which were never mentioned in the MSM.
3. There is no police shoot out video, despite what claims are. Police simply approach the side of the truck that has no "bullet holes" and go around it. There is no scene at all of them shooting the glass, or putting a single bullet hole in the truck. There is only sound, which could be dubbed in and no glass fragments flying, no holes appearing, NOTHING. All "holes" appear at angles the camera never gets live, despite the fact that the camera followed the police in! This would be done if you used bullet stickers, and had pre existing holes in the cab, on the OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE TRUCK already in place for the still cameras later that the video camera could not ever see because if they were there before the police arrived, it would prove it all fake. We are just supposed to believe this camera guy stayed in the line of fire as the police shot towards him, from the side of the cab you can't see, after they went around it ON THE SAME VIDEO.
When I first heard of this story, I made a few assumptions that were wrong. I assumed the truck swerved and hit people. That was wrong, despite the fact they said it. I assumed the truck went into an area that was blocked off for pedestrians only, down a path way that only people were supposed to be on. I BELIEVED THAT WAS THE STORY, BECAUSE THEY SAID SO. THAT WAS WRONG, IT WAS JUST ON A NORMAL STREET THAT WAS NOT BLOCKED OFF AT ALL.
CONTINUE AND VIEW ALL PHOTOS:
http://82.221.129.208/ifyouareinamericayouprobablycantseethisaj3.html