Canada: The Practices of Corporate Mining
Michael Werbowski
Canadians are have at times been led to believe how their role in
Painful Extraction
In November, while the country was still reeling from the revelations of one of its top former ambassadors to Kabul, in another wing of parliament a rapt house of commons committee sat spellbound listening to testimonials and gory blood curdling tales of gang rapes in places like Papua New Guinea (MPs told of gang rapes at mine-Toronto Star, 24-11-09) and of underworld like intimidation of a former Argentinean minister (Mining companies threatened me: Ex Argentinean Minister, Toronto Star, 24-11-09). There are so many egregious cases of corporate social irresponsibility and wanton plunder coming home to roost now in
The methodology of mining
These documented case studies reflect poorly of on the countries increasingly sullied and blood soaked international image and on its “good” corporate citizens as well.
Mining in order to be profitable must be done on the cheap and in places where labour laws and environmental standards are far below Canadian standards. The methods used to extract the earth’s wealth use toxic chemicals (arsenic, mercury, cyanide) and by means of “heap leaching”; a process which uses huge amount of chemically laced water which then separates the worthless mineral ore waste from the coveted precious gold or silver dug from the ground. As a result, tons of rock removed from an open pit mine site for instance, is then stored as ‘tailings” in toxic sludge like sewers or cesspools to stagnate and seep into groundwater forever. The poisonous remnants contaminate the land (above and below) for generations. These practises are as the MP’s and mining executives, lobbyists listening to the litany of complaints from foreigners affected by mining, quite unpopular among local communities both on the ground and in the field. When resistance is unremitting then the companies (often in complicity with the local authorities) resort to more sinister methods to clear the land. They hire armed goons and with the help of the “security forces” they displace the “trouble makers” in order to make room for an open pit mine. Or worse contract mob like hit men to do away with local mining activists opposed to their activities (“Anti Mining Activist Mariano Abarca Assassinated in
What can be done?
A private member’s bill baptized C-300 which was introduced by Toronto Liberal MP John McKay (For details of this bill listen to: “Discussion of Bill C-300 and Corporate Accountability at www.fridaymorningafter.wordpress.com) seeks to tighten scrutiny of mining companies’ operations offshore. The bill although unlikely to ever pass both houses of parliament would create an ombudsman to examine the complaints for both Canadian citizens and foreigners regarding corporate mining maleficent. But more menacing to the mining operatives is it would cut of taxpayers’ funding for overseas mining ventures which the industry now enjoys by means of EDC (Export Development Canada) and the CPP (Canada Pension Plan).
This given the huge efforts by mining industry minions or lobbyists to bury the bill even before it gets a second reading in the house, seems to be a pie in the sky idea. But it is a first very small step in the right direction. No matter what the good intentions of corporate bosses seeking to assuage the concerns of nervous investors and pension fund holders maybe, or even those of bold men like John McKay, who wish to clean up the dirty industry, there is still this irksome notion: if the mining industry is not reigned in soon, then the evil Mr. Hyde may get the better of the good Dr. Jekyll and more mining horror stories will told on parliament hill to the discomfort of many in the future.
Michael Werbowski is an award winning environmental journalist and former business editor at “The News” in
www.globalresearch.ca/index.php