Custom Search
SOCIAL SECURITY TAXES
DB
Sept. 6,2012
Dear Patrick
There is so much dis-info related to taxes that I think people should be aware of.
The recent article complaining that the SS checks now show Federal Benefit Entitlement is off base. This is not insurance, there is no trust fund, it has been ruled by the Supreme Court that this is a government giveaway program. The SS taxes go directly into the general fund of the government and are not segregated in any way. The SS payments are appropriated by Congress and have nothing to do with the amount of taxes that are collected. Once again it is smoke and mirrors that has deceived the masses.
Phoenix Journal #16 lays this out in detail, and I have summarized this for anyone that wants to use it.
Basically, all payroll taxes are the same whether they are FICA, Federal Income, State income, Medicare etc. They are all INDIRECT TAXES in the form of EXCISE TAXES. The trick was that the 16th ammendment to the constitution created a jurisdiction called the UNITED STATES, that supposedly gave the authority to write the USC. However, if you dont live in DC, then the statutues do not apply to you. You are considered a NONTAXPAYER and therefore without the scope of USC 26.
Here are the court sites that I have taken from Journal 16 in the form of a letter of understanding that could be recorded with the county clerk as an example.
This is a little bit long to read, and anyone interested in this should read Journal 16- You Can Slay the Dragon!
Enjoy!
DB
NOTICE OF UNDERSTANDING AND INTENT
AND CLAIM OF RIGHT
Your County Florida
Page 1 of 4
From: R. DEBT SLAVE
To: Internal Revenue Service, to whom it may concern Date: 8-15-2012
- Whereas, this party, R. DEBT SLAVE, believes his current status to be a NONTAXPAYER.
2. Whereas, this party believes, under penalty of perjury, that all previously submitted tax forms such as W4, 1040 etc, signed by R. DEBT SLAVE are null and void because the status of this person is a NONTAXPAYER.
3. And whereas, this party cites the US Declaration of Independence which states “That all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain inalienable rights, and that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness”. This is supported in U.S. Supreme Court decision in Butcher’s Union Co. v. Crescent City Co., 111 U.S. 746, at 756-757 (1883).
4. And whereas, this party cites US Supreme Court decision in Murdoch vs Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105, at page 113, (1943), that “a state may not impose a charge for the enjoyment of a right granted by the Federal Constitution”.
5. And whereas, this party cites US Supreme Court decision in Tyler vs US, 281 U.S 497, at page 502, (1930), “a tax laid upon the happening of an event, as distinguished from its tangible fruits, is an INDIRECT TAX”.
6. And whereas, this party cites US Supreme Court decision in Flint v. Stone Tracy Co., 220 U.S. 107, at page 154: “We must remember, too, that the revenues of the United States must be obtained in the same territory, from the same people, and EXCISE taxes must be collected from the same activities, as are also reached by the States in order to support their local government” and “Conceding the power of Congress to tax the business activities of private corporations….the tax must be measured by some standard…” (pg 165, Flint, supra.) and “It is therefore well settled by the decisions of this court that when the sovereign authority has exercised the right to tax a legitimate subject of taxation as an exercise of a franchise or privilege, it is no objection that the MEASURE OF TAXATION IS FOUND IN THE INCOME”.
7. And whereas, this party states that all income producing activities of R. DEBT SLAVE only involve the exercise of constitutionally guaranteed rights, such as earning a living, by engaging in lawful, innocent and harmless activities.
NOTICE OF UNDERSTANDING AND INTENT
AND CLAIM OF RIGHT
Your County Florida
Page 2 of 4
From: R. DEBT SLAVE
To: Internal Revenue Service, to whom it may concern Date: 8-15-2012
8. And whereas, this party cites the Oregon Supreme Court, Redfield v. Fisher, 292 P. 813, pg. 819 (1930): “The individual, unlike the corporation, cannot be taxed for the mere privilege of existing. The corporation is an artificial entity, which owes its existence and charter powers to the state, but the individuals’ right to live and own property are natural rights for the enjoyment of which an EXCISE CANNOT BE IMPOSED.
9. And whereas, this party believes, that one who is exercising his constitutionally guaranteed right to exist by engaging in lawful, innocent and harmless activities is a “NONTAXPAYER” AND IS NOT SUBJECT TO THE REVENUE LAWS.
10. And whereas, this party cites US Supreme Court decision Brushaber v. Union Pacific R.R. Co., 240 U.S. 1, pg 118: “The contention that the Amendment treats a tax on income as a direct tax…is… wholly without foundation..”. and pages 16-17, “The conclusion reached in the Pollack Case did not in any degree involve holding that income taxes generically and necessarily came within the class of direct taxes on property, but on the contrary recognized the FACT that taxation on income was in its nature an EXCISE tax entitled to be enforced as such…”
11. And whereas, this party cites Economy Plumbing and Heating v. U.S.; 470 F.2d 585, at 589 1972: “The revenue laws are a code or system in regulation of tax assessment and collection. They relate to TAXPAYERS, and not to NONTAXPAYERS. The latter are without their scope. NO PROCEDURE IS PRESCRIBED FOR NONTAXPAYERS, and no attempt is made to annul any of their rights and remedies in due course of law. With them Congress does not assume to deal, and they are neither of the subject nor of the object of the revenue laws.”
12. And whereas, this party cites Internal Revenue Code 26 U.S.C. 7701(a)(14): The term “taxpayer” means any person subject to any internal revenue tax. And 26 U.S.C.6001: Every person liable for any tax imposed by this title…shall keep records, render statements, make returns,…(in part), and 26 U.S.C. 6011(a) General Rule: When required by regulations prescribed by the Secretary any person MADE LIABLE for any tax imposed by this title…shall make a return or statement…(in part).
NOTICE OF UNDERSTANDING AND INTENT AND CLAIM OF RIGHT
Your County Florida
Page 3 of 4
From: R. DEBT SLAVE
To: Internal Revenue Service, to whom it may concern Date: 8-15-2012
13. And whereas, this party believes that the Internal Revenue Code does not make any person liable for an “income tax”. The Internal Revenue Code only applies to “Any person made liable”.
14. Therefore, this party believes that R. DEBT SLAVE is not subject to or liable for any revenue laws for he has only engaged in activities involving the exercise of constitutionally guaranteed rights, such as earning a living, by engaging in lawful, innocent and harmless activities. To repeat the cite above: Economy Plumbing and Heating v. U.S.; 470 F.2d 585, at 589 1972: “The revenue laws are a code or system in regulation of tax assessment and collection. They relate to TAXPAYERS, and not to NONTAXPAYERS. The latter are without their scope. NO PROCEDURE IS PRESCRIBED FOR NONTAXPAYERS, and no attempt is made to annul any of their rights and remedies in due course of law. With them Congress does not assume to deal, and they are neither of the subject nor of the object of the revenue laws.” Therefore, R. DEBT SLAVE IS A NONTAXPAYER.
15. And whereas, this party has shown from the above statements and court decisions that the “income tax” is an indirect tax in the nature of an excise, and that an indirect tax is only imposed upon activities which are taxable for revenue purposes. R. DEBT SLAVE has not engaged in any activities that are defined as taxable for revenue purposes.
16. Caveat: Failure by the named recipients to respond with full rebuttal of any and all points on this NOTICE will be an admission of intent of malfeasance against R. DEBT SLAVE by the named recipients of this NOTICE, and shall be deemed to be an act of FRAUD AND INTENDED EXTORTION.
----- Original Message -----
From: DB
To: Bellringer
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 4:20 PM
Subject: Social Security Taxes