FourWinds10.com - Delivering Truth Around the World
Custom Search

RE: You're Not a 'Citizen ' Under the Internal Revenue Code

More Recent Stories

Help Us Grow

Like Us On Facebook and Follow Our Posts

Most Emailed

Steven

Smaller Font Larger Font RSS 2.0

----- Original Message -----
From: Steven
To: bellringer@fourwinds10.com
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2008 4:56 PM
Subject: RE: You're Not a 'Citizen' Under the Internal Revenue Code
 
Patrick -- No man or woman can be a Citizen, National or state Citizen either.   Those titles are all reserved for the legal entity/person.
 
Maxim of law of like kind - paper to paper, flesh to flesh - not paper to flesh.
 
Since the U.S. is a corporation, as stated in their own codes (USC), how can someone be a Citizen of a corporation?  Surely it is an impossibility.   People will say, no, the U.S. is a country...but that is the united States of America and that is NOT how it reads on any form, application or document.    People need to understand just who they are and who they are supposedly "voting" for.   It is the President of the U.S. corporation.   [actual citing 28 USC 3002 (15) A] www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode28/usc_sec_28_00003002----000-.html    
 
for example: 
 City of & County of Los Angeles, State of California -- all corporations (check their charters for proof) what makes one think the United States is not?
 
Do you recall this line below in the movie, "The Interpreter"?  (starring Nicole Kidman & Sean Penn). Well, the truth is often revealed in movies, just people don't see or hear it for what it's sharing.  A great example of an allegory movie was "Wizard of Oz" – read this link:http://freedom-school.com/the_wizard_of_oz.pdf 
 
"Despite all the flags on First Avenue, there are no nations any more, only companies - international companies. lt's where we are. lt's what we are". -- Kuman-Kuman to Sylvia Broome in the movie "The Interpreter" in reference to the United Nations on First Avenue at 46th St. in New York.     ... incidentally, the tagline for the film:  The truth needs no translation. 
 
 
Now for some information about the NAME.  Conversion goes much deeper than the monetary issue, as it is EVERYTHING the banksters do.   Conversion means altering its nature.  Thus from a living being to a corporate entity.....from man/woman to a PERSON.  Conversion using admiralty laws so all is in commerce.   Conversion from Patrick Bellringer (living man) to PATRICK BELLRINGER (legal entity).    Bellringer is actually  just the family name, but is used along with the birth date to capture jurisdiction if One does not know that you're being asked to "volunteer" as an indentured "servant" person to the corporate system.  
 
Some attorneys say this "strawman" issue is nonsense, yet I hold my form and merely state facts.   It all relates in the conversion to PERSON.  Just take a look at the state issued drivers license, passport, any and all commercial invoices, bills, plane tickets, etc.,  all have the legal entity.  People sign forms that declare they are a "U.S. Person".  Huh?  The U.S. is a corporation, not a country by definition. Americans are enslaved by ignorance and arrogance too.
 
Common usage of the word "person" is -- a human being --  However, legal codes/statutes define it this way: "Person" means an individual, corporation, partnership, association, firm, or other legal entity.  That nails it right there....or other legal entity.  So then a person is a legal entity, NOT a living breathing man or a woman.  Use of the word "individual" confuses people, but it is simply a legal entity disguised as a man or woman.  How may a man or woman be considered the same as a corporation or any other legal entity?  Can't happen.  Impossible.   
 
“person” is a word of the Private Civil Law, and a “man” is a word of nature.
 
This one word "PERSON" is the crux of control over the people.   If you consider yourself a person or U.S. Citizen/person or sign any paperwork that states that you are such, you are voluntarily accepting that role/status and control apparatus.  You are then considered in their jurisdiction.    
 
Natural person vs. artificial person, is just like a green apple vs. red apple, go back to the NOUN and drop the adjectives -- still a person, and still an apple.   So forget the STRAWMAN issue, because that is the PERSON.   A man/woman shouldn't even be in those private tribunal commercial courts.  Notice the word "man" or "woman" is not anywhere to be found in those copyrighted statutes either. 
  
True freedom will come once people understand this and stop volunteering!  Spread the word or remain as an indentured servant to the system.
 
Best,
Steven 
 
p.s.
 
"True freedom doesn't come from a piece of paper, right or privilege, rather it's the understanding of status as sovereign and being one" ~ Steven

"To the Constitution of the United States the term sovereign is totally unknown. There is but one place where it could have been used with propriety. But, even in that place it would not, perhaps have comported with the delicacy of those who ordained and established that Constitution...They might have announced themselves 'sovereign' people of the United States: But serenely conscious of the fact, they avoided the ostentatious declaration" - Chisholm vs Georgia (US) 2 Dall 419, 454, 1 L Ed 440,455

The people that live in what was known as the united States of America, fail to realize that they are not living in freedom, if they are under double/triple taxation, licenses are considered privileges and the law of the land is no longer recognized by the men/women who are supposedly governing.

Much of what has been sold as "truth" in govt. and religions are lies, because it is all about control. People have given away their power. For example, people came to America supposedly to get away from the control of the King of England and become sovereigns. That power was taken away again by the deceptive founders through their so called CONstitution which is a controlling document and among other acts. There is not anyone alive today that is a party to that document and that is why the Bush Admin laughs/mocks it. People also accept the label of persons (legal entity), and willingly accept benefits/privileges which is not what a sovereign would do. A sovereign controls his/her own functionality and takes full responsibility for his/her actions. That by the way, is what Common Law is all about. But America is NOT under that!

By the way, why is it in the Constitution, the words People and Posterity are capitalized?

A capitonym is a word that changes its meaning (and sometimes pronunciation) when it is capitalized, and usually applies to capitalization due to proper nouns or eponyms

PREAMBLE to the UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America

Now the question to ask, were you signatory to that declaration (Constitution) and most importantly, if you think that you are "covered" under being one of "We the People", - guess again, because when they capitalized it, the meaning of the word was changed to reflect a particular group of "people", and the Prosperity was for those future generations to theirs, not yours

Hard core facts -- most of Americans live this life - they are bonded (see social security card and numbers on the back), indentured servants to the Corporation that is running the show/the game/the illusion and they have tricked most people into thinking they are "free", yet they are absolutely not ! Time to pull the curtain and reveal the Wizard of Oz?      http://freedom-school. com/the_wizard_of_oz. pdf

Who is running America?

Have you ever asked that question?

Under the doctrine of Parens Patriae, "Government As Parent", as a result of the manipulated bankruptcy of the United States of America in 1930, ALL the assets of the American people, their person, and of our country itself are held by the Depository Trust Corporation at 55 Water Street, NY, NY, secured by UCC Commercial Liens, which are then monetized as "debt money" by the Federal Reserve... It may interest you to know that under the umbrella of the Depository Trust Corporation lies the CEDE Corporation, the Federal Reserve Corporation, the American Bar Association, the legal arm of the banking interests, and the Internal Revenue Service, the system's collection agency...

A must read link: www. barefootsworld. net/usfraud. html

Don't Mind the Men Behind the Curtain: 

 
Owners of this Country:

NOW THAT YOU KNOW - WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT IT?!

ARE YOU GOING TO ALSO SHARE THIS WITH OTHERS...

Always do your own diligence, but most importantly do it !

Start taking your power back!

 
 
btw:   there is no accountability in this corporation either!   MOST AMERICANS are NOT AWARE OF THIS FACT !
 

the lack of full cooperation from Bush/Cheney with 9/11 Commission NOT UNDER OATH.   this is extremely telling!

While President Bush and Vice President Cheney did ultimately agree to testify, they did so only under several conditions:

  • They would be allowed to testify jointly;
  • They would not be required to take an oath before testifying;
  • The testimony would not be recorded electronically or transcribed, and that the only record would be notes taken by one of the commission staffers;
  • These notes would not be made public.

The commission agreed to these conditions, and the President and Vice President gave their testimony on April 29.

above information taken from this source:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_Commission 

On 9/11 - Bush stated: "...The search is underway for those who are behind these evil acts. I've directed the full resources of our intelligence and law enforcement communities to find those responsible and to bring them to justice. We will make no distinction between the terrorists who committed these acts and those who harbor them..."   http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/09/20010911-16.html

Then it takes over a year to set up and begin the 911 Commission?!?!  This has to be made an issue (because Bush clearly fought the formation of the commission), plus the non oath.  Congress and Senate should have stepped in and held these men accountable.   Because they did not, there are themselves culpable.  

9/11 Commission - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    "The National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, also known as the 9/11 Commission, was set up on November 27, 2002 "to prepare a full ..."

Officials called to testify

Then government officials who were called to testify before the Commission included:

Past government officials who were called to testify before the Commission included:

President George W. Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney, former President Bill Clinton, and former Vice President Al Gore all gave private testimony without oaths. President Bush and Vice President Cheney insisted on testifying together, while Clinton and Gore met with the panel separately. As the National Security Advisor, Condoleezza Rice was not required to testify under oath because the position of NSA is an advisory role, independent of authority over a bureaucracy and does not require confirmation by the Senate.

 

Related in this Category