From: Legal Reality <legal_reality@earthlink.net>

Date: July 26, 2011 11:27:33 AM PDT

To: Legal Reality <legal_reality@earthlink.net>

Subject: Fwd: CA: CPS rips apart family

26 July A.D. 2011

On a "choice of law" note, GMT and UTC are conflicting time zones.  GMT is the Common Law standard, and UTC is the "new world order's" imitation ofGMT.  (Item noted in red in the "Original Message" header.)

On the substantive legal point regarding the story below, some problems we face these days are not curable.  They are only preventable.

Courts have authority over kids born to "commercial families."  What is a "commercial family?"  A couple married per a "license."  (Nothing is mentioned in the story below as to whether the Hendersons are a "commercial family" or not.  This author expects that they are.  Otherwise, "kidnapping" would be just one of several criminal charges possible to bring against those CPS "officials" and "agents.") 

What is any "license" for?  Permission in/by/from "this state" to engage in some line or other of commercial activity in "this state."  What do married people do that could possibly be "commercial?"  "Make babies."

At the base of this CPS monstrosity is the legal reality that kids are "property."  

To solve a problem, it must first be identified correctly.  In solving problems of a legal/governmental nature in a time and age of "funny money," it really helps to understand that "federal" means "federal."  It doesn't mean "national."  Thus, "federal" is not something that limited solely to the national level of government. "Federal" is how "government" at all levels, from school boards up, operate.  "Federal" also and most certainly doesn't mean "constitutional."  We can review history more than sufficiently to satisfy ourselves that there has never been any "constitution" or "constitutional government" at the national level.  

In short, "federal" has never changed its meaning, not from Day One.  When we're talking about a "state," a "nation," a "body politic," i.e., what this author will call a "church," i.e., at the level of a "state," "federal" means "by compact" or "by treaty."  When we're talking about an individual, "federal" means "by agreement."

Thus, by what mechanism does any CPS "official" have authority in any situation?  "Federally," i.e., "by agreement."

From whence comes that agreement?  Certainly the most significant source is the "marriage license."  Couples who marry in "this state" by means of a "license" are inviting STATE into their homes to have STATE help them raise "their" kids.

From a different angle, why is there a legislative push toward "allowing," i.e., "licensing," homosexual partners?  One angle, of course, is STATE's desire to increase its fee and tax base.  Another angle is that this author expects that adoption is limited to "licensed" families.  And, of course, for lesbian couples, which are fully capable of reproduction, the "license" invites STATE into the home for purposes of raising "their" kids.

In short, any couple married under STATE "license" is openly inviting CPS into their home where "commercial property" is produced by that marriage.

 

Let's look at this concept of STATE's invitation into the home from another angle.  Some may remember the story out of Tennessee of the 20-year-old veteran who was drinking beer, inside the home, with his Dad when the cops showed up at an early morning hour serving a warrant on the wrong house.  What result?  The veteran (minor) was charged with underage consumption of alcohol. This author has studied a very similar case that occurred in North Texas.

By what possible mechanism may a STATE regulate alcohol consumption within the privacy of a home, whether it's the one the minor normally lives in or someone else's?   

One possible commercial nexus between STATE and any minor is the existence of a "marriage license" in that minor's history.  In other words, IF that minor was born to a "commercial family," then STATE has an interest, a property interest, a commercial interest, in that minor.

Another possible commercial nexus is the "ID," whether a STATE's "driver's license" or a military ID.  A "driver's license" is not just a commercial permit.  A driver's license is also a citizenship statement.  It's a confirmation of "church membership" in "church of STATE OF ___________."  Of course, the military ID is a confirmation of "church membership" in "church of ARMED FORCES."  The relevance a military ID in such circumstances is expected to be little to none, but what seems to be the case with all military personnel is that they all have current/active driver's licenses.

STATEs have inter-STATE compacts regarding all kinds of things.  This is why it's possible to get a ticket in California where one has a STATE OF NEW YORK "driver's license."  

If memory serves, the veteran in Tennessee called Tennessee home.  Chances are good that he was born into a "commercial family."  Where we put the commercial pieces of these puzzles together, we identify the problem correctly.

Where we see the commercial nature of the problem, we also see the commercial nature of the solution.  Where we see the commercial nature of the solution, we also realize that prevention is the ONLY cure for a LOT of the issues that vex us these days.

Life can be very different for people who refuse to participate in the commercial traps set up for us so that "they" may control us commercially.  No marriage license, no driver's license, no SSN, etc.  However, the reality is that there are enough people fitting that same description these days that the economic community necessary to keep the basics available very definitely exists.

To do the "right thing," we have to have a good understanding of the options.  There are not very many people "out there" who both understand our present legal reality AND are in a position to discuss it.  That burdens this author with the task of initiating those conversations.  

At the end of the day, CPS is designed to destroy families.  The Christian family is the greatest threat to the international banking cartel, and for this reason, the Christian family has been "under attack" for decades now.  The international banking cartel has provided all nations populated very predominately by Caucasian people with every enticement to stray from Scriptural morality known to mankind.  As nations, we've accepted the offer to stray.  For this reason, God is Judging us.  How do we know it's God?  War, Famine, Pestilence, and "Beasts."  God promised He'd "reveal" Himself in a certain way.  John talks about all kinds of things, including The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse (of the "revealing").  Who/What are these Four Horsemen?  War, Famine, Pestilence, and "Beasts."  God changes not.  His Laws are Eternal.  Thus, it should come as zero surprise to us that the Judgments He promised via Ezekiel (14:21) are the exact same ones He promised us that prove His Kingdom and His Sovereignty, for which see Rev. 6:8.  War, Famine, Pestilence, and "Beasts."  These are Divine Judgments.  Within the present "Beast" system is CPS.  The "Beast's" controlled media types will tell us all about all the "good" things that CPS "officials" have accomplished.  No doubt that we can each find at least one CPS case in which we'd have to agree that the children were better off after CPS intervention than before.  However, what we're seeing here is how "political correctness" is enforced through CPS, which goal is, of course, clearly the foundational purpose for CPS.

We cannot simultaneously (1) agree to share "property rights" in our children AND THEN (2) buck the system when it comes to "mental conditioning" of those kids.  We have to make a choice.  There's one and only one time to make that choice, and that's sometime before having kids.  That is to say that establishing a "commercial family" is 100% voluntary. 

It's an insidiously evil system we're facing these days.  It IS possible to get loose from it, but it's NOT possible to get loose from it until one has a firm grasp of the commercial nature of that system. We've "been had" for so long in so many ways that adjusting to the reality is a rather wicked paradigm shift.  At least as wicked to our present sensibilities is realizing what cannot be changed once it was set in motion.  This is part and parcel of the learning that some problems have solutions that appear SOLELY in the form of prevention.

Harmon L. Taylor

Legal Reality

Dallas, Texas

Subscribe / unsubscribe :  legal_reality@earthlink.net

-------- Original Message --------

Subject:	CA: CPS rips apart family
Date:	Mon, 25 Jul 2011 17:36:46 +0000 (UTC)

Saturday, July 23, 2011

Homeschool, Anti-vaccine Family Ripped Apart by CPS: Chronology of a Kidnapping

http://www.activistpost.com/2011/07/homeschool-anti-vaccine-family-being.html

Henderson Family ripped apart by CPS because of lifestyle

Activist Post  

PASADENA, CA - The case of Jeffrey and Erica Henderson provides a continuation of the critical examination of Child Protective Services in the United States, as well as the legal framework in which CPS operates. 

The Hendersons were investigated at their home following an anonymous tip that Mr. Henderson had slapped his daughter.  Jeffrey Henderson was arrested on the scene, and their 6 children subsequently put into foster homes.  The Hendersons speculate that the call was placed by their landlord, whom they had reported to the Health Department for having dangerous mold issues in their rental.  Regardless of who placed the call, it is instructive to look at the chronology of how the system of "protecting children" has responded to this perceived threat to the welfare of six children ranging in age from 10 months to 8 years, all based on one phone call.  This story might prove to be a similar cautionary tale as that of citizen spy programs in tyrannical regimes.   The Hendersons' story, as well as the wider story of CPS abuse, reveals American society and its values, while questioning whose interests are really being served by removing children from the custody of their own parents.  

For background, the Hendersons are proponents of homeschooling, home birthing, no vaccines, and are Messianic Jewish by faith.  The Hendersons assert that their children are loved, well-cared for, and nurtured children and have not abused by their parents.  However, the chronology provided below suggests that these children have been repeatedly and profoundly abused by the very system supposedly charged with their protection.

 

The following timeline of events was provided by Erica Henderson, mother of these six children.  Clearly, this is a one-sided representation of events and we cannot verify each of the statements, but most telling is the fact that all charges were eventually dropped.  Yet, their children remain in foster homes under the direction of CPS.  Until this family is reunited, we feel that the term kidnapping is properly applied.

May 25, 2010 – Pasadena police came to our door investigating child abuse stemming from an anonymous call made to 911. The caller said she heard Jeffrey slap Abigail. We did not let the police in. After almost two hours of talking to the police, they used a battering ram to gain entry to our home without a warrant and without our consent. During these two hours they tried to obtain a warrant by a judge in Pasadena and were told they could not have one as there were no exigent circumstances. They ran in, guns drawn, and told Jeffrey to get down on the ground. He did. Jeffrey was beaten, cuffed and taken to the hospital. Jeffrey was detained and ticketed from the hospital for PC 148 a1, resisting an officer. The officers searched our home, strip searched and interviewed our children and found no evidence of abuse. I was never arrested or ticketed.

The audio of the incident on May 25, 2010 is here:

http://www.sovereignparty.com/audio/1-one.wav

http://www.sovereignparty.com/audio/2-two.wav

http://www.sovereignparty.com/audio/3-three.wav

http://www.sovereignparty.com/audio/4-four.wav

http://www.sovereignparty.com/audio/5-five.wav

http://www.sovereignparty.com/audio/6-six.wav

http://www.sovereignparty.com/audio/7-seven.wav

http://www.sovereignparty.com/audio/8-eight.wav

http://www.sovereignparty.com/audio/9-nine.wav

Partial video of the encounter: 

http://www.youtube.com/v/U4KP0xp7-30?version=3

June 14, 2010 - Jeffrey goes before a city counsel meeting and asks for help with our problems with the neighbor, the broken door and the bogus charges. He writes and rehearses a speech for the city council meeting. There are no comments or questions, he is ignored. We also write to our city counsel member, Victor Gordo. He does not respond. June 2010 - Jeffrey begins fighting our case in propria persona, or without an attorney’s counsel. In court Jeffrey is informed that I am also charged with PC 148 a1. Jeffrey informs the court that he will be arguing the case for both of us.June 2010 – March 2011 - Jeffrey goes to court once or twice a month 
filing motions that were denied. 3 more counts of PC 148 as well as 4 counts of misdemeanor child endangerment were added to each of us. The prosecution alleged we were guilty of resisting an officer by not opening the door when the police said to, and child endangerment because of the psychological damage suffered by the children from watching the door being beat down. August 6, 2010 - Jeffrey goes to court on a scheduled court date and was arrested. The court did not serve Jeffrey with the paperwork, there is no proof of service on file. He spent 3 weeks in jail for a bench warrant for failure to appear on this case. He was released and continued to file motions. November 23, 2010 - Jeffrey files a claim for damages against the city of Pasadena. December 14, 2010 - Appeal demurrer overruled by Judge Beason. December 22, 2010 -  Jeffrey files a claim for damages against the county of Los Angeles. 

March 7, 2011 - Jeffrey begins filing appeals through the appellate court for his denied motions. His requests in the appellate court are denied and he files a writ of certerari with the California Supreme court which was accepted on April 18, 2011. At this point his superior court case in Pasadena is put on hold until the Supreme Cou rt makes a ruling. The case was denied by the California Supreme Court on Monday April 25, 2011, the day Jeffrey and I were arrested. The police came to our home, knocked in both doors without warning and arrested Jeffrey and I and CPS took our children into custody as well. This action was coordinated by MART (Multi Agency Response Team). We were arrested on a bench warrant for failure to appear. These actions were carefully planned. April 25 - June 21, 2011 - We sit in jail while we wait for our case to go to trial. Towards the end we were offered many “deals” by the prosecution, but did not take them because of our attorney’s advice that the case would be dismissed before it made it to trial. Jeffrey suffered greatly in jail, not getting a Kosher diet and being severely beaten in custody while hand-cuffed. His arm and five fingers were broken as well as sustaining soft tissue damage to the head.June 21, 2011 - Judge Villa Lobos dismissed the case following an 1118.1 motion, for lack of grounds to proceed to trial. Jeffrey was released a day later due to a “hold” put on him as a result of his beating by the police. We were free, but homeless and childless. Our landlord removed everything out of our home while we were incarcerated. He did this without legal notice, and refuses to give us our things, including thousands of dollars in cash. We were told we must go before a judge in children's court on July 13, 2011 before our children can be released to our care. Case No.: 0PS0215801  Court Name: NORTHEAST/ALHAMBRA SUPR CT X  Court Address: 150 WEST ...COMMONWEALTH AVE Court City: ALHAMBRAUPT  Bail Amount: 0 Fine Amount: .00  Court Date: 06/21/2011  Sentence Date: 06/21/2011  Number of days Sentenced: 0  Disposition Code: DISM Disposition Description: DISMISSED   June 24, 2011 - We signed paperwork with an attorney to take over our lawsuit of the city of Pasadena, which now includes every incident that happened as a result of our unlawful arrest on April 25th, 2011. July 13, 2011 Jeff and Erica went to court at 8:30am, with some show of support by family and friends.  They were then able to see the CPS charges against them: 1. Their children are not vaccinated. 2.  A neighbor reported seeing Jeff drink a beer. The children are now wetting the bed while in foster care. The judge d id not discuss them getting their children back. He stated that the youngest was allowed breastmilk ONLY from Erica, no longer allowing the Human Milk for Human Babies group to donate milk.  And that they would look into placing the children in two foster homes that speak English. Another hearing is scheduled August 24th. July 21, 2011 The children have been moved into separate foster homes and are not receiving Erica's breastmilk for the baby, kosher meals, and now have not shown up for there court ordered visitation. For more information about this case please visit the Henderson's blog: Henderson Children Belong at Home  For additional information about the vast history of proven CPS abuse, see below: Whistleblower and former Senator Nancy Schaefer discussed CPS corruption and the business of legal kidnapping prior to her being shot to death in March, 2010.  Originally believed to be a murder-suicide committed by her husband, compelling evidence has surfaced that suggests it to have been more likely a double homicide.

http://www.youtube.com/embed/K1HjVU-UIQU

Innocence Destroyed, Part 1 (Graphic): Investigating the deaths of over 1,000 children per year in the custody of various states.  Extraordinarily difficult to watch, but
 important in beginning to comprehend the magnitude of the violence done to children while under CPS care.  

http://www.youtube.com/v/48YF1uEuCUA?version=3

• Corporate Law
• Go Back

Related in this Category