I am too close to trial to do anymore Sunday mock courts, but I will still be doing the Sunday evening talkshoe.

I need donations, and I fell I deserve them more than ever right now. This new complaint will trash ALL of the banks and undue all the shit that has gone wrong. I do believe it was a divinely inspired epiphany so I could spend my time working on this case. I credit the Father for the idea, and our own Mike and Mary B. for helping me get it focused and out there.

So send the attachment to everyone on your list (please ask that they send me a donation) and tell them to add their ideas.

It MUST remain 1 CLAIM and 1 REMEDY so it cannot be argued against. Either they did or did not do their Fiduciary duties equally.

In all reality, I doubt the TRUSTEE will even appear and risk the criminal charge. 

John C. Stuart

aka Mobius Nemesis

"Now remember, when things look bad and it looks like you’re not gonna make it, then you gotta get mean. I mean plumb, mad-dog mean. ‘Cause if you lose your head and you give up then you neither live nor win. That’s just the way it is.”   ~" Outlaw"  Josey Wales  

First Draft August 11, 2008

  A single claim, no reason to muddy the waters and give them a basis to mis-   direct us down the rabbit hole.

  This prevents the judge from being in a bad spot since a quiet Title is     totally voidable by anyone that has the proper valid legal documents.

  This is all that’s needed as a “proof of claim” to initiate the suit

 No, they do NOT teach this in law school and attorneys will argue its wrong,  then they realize it’s the whole foundation of civil law; it’s a wake up call for  everyone. (I’ve taught it for years, people are starting to listen)

 This is why we lose. The presumption the TRUSTEE is real and valid means that all  the judge has to do is what the TRUSTEE orders him to do. It’s called TRUST  LAW, not contract law. Remember, DEED OF TRUST not DEED OF CONTRACT  DAH!!!!!!

 The law firms are always screaming the borrower is in default, but that does not  matter, it only matters if the LOAN is in default, which is not possible.

 TRUSTEE, TRUSTOR, BENEFICIARY:

 No one can be two parties; no attorney can represent 2 parties; that’s called conflict  of interest. So if MERS claims they are the TRUSTEE then they lied when they  claimed they were the Beneficiary. TRUSTEE must be registered and real, fake  TRUSTEE does not exist in law.

 So how can the TRUSTEE be issuing fraudulently notarized documents to help the  Beneficiary and screw the Trustor? It is not like a divorce; where the woman gets  the gold mind and the man gets the shaft.

 The notary complaint is sufficient prima facie evidence (even if not answered; it’s  the complaint not the response that counts) to initiate the suit.