"Proof"? The presentation is the proof.

A review of all Congressional, Treasury and GFOA communications with the IRS over decades establishes the same brought forward.

Now if someone had a big crow-bar, and knew how to use it, then getting the Corporate AFR of the IRS would tell all.

 

Walter Burien - CAFR1

P. O. Box 2112

Saint Johns, AZ 85936

 

Tel. (928) 458-5854

__________________________________

 

 

 

 

---------- Forwarded message ----------

 

From: Paul Andrew Mitchell supremelawfirm@gmail.com>

Date: Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 12:14 PM

Subject: Re: URGENT URGETN READ Audit of the IRS - 1999 & 2010

To: Joseph Mockaitis mockaitis1942@yahoo.com>

Cc: Walter Burien WalterBurien@cafr1.com>, SupremeLaw supremelaw@googlegroups.com>

 

 

 

>  their internal AFR showing their corporate structure and corporate identity

Where does it state or imply that IRS is a "corporation", please?

Where was/is that "corporation" chartered, please?

 

 

If by Congress, there will need to be a Statute at Large (volume and page number);

if by one of the several States of the Union, then there will need to be a record

of that incorporation with that State's Secretary of State.

If it was/is incorporated, at a bare minimum there will need to be

 

a registration record with a designated Agent for Service of Process.

I need a LOT MORE PROOF than some vague reference(s) to

"that one they keep under lock and key" [sic].

Our research indicates that it is presently doing business as Trust #62
as domiciled in San Juan, Puerto Rico:

http://www.supremelaw.org/sls/31answers.htm

 

http://www.supremelaw.org/authors/cooper/

 

http://www.supremelaw.org/authors/luxford/

 

 

FYI:  We have already sued out DOJ's missing powers of attorney

legally to represent the IRS:

 

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/wishart/cross.complaint.2.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/wishart/reply.cross.complaint.2.htm

 

 

I like a lot of Walter's research, but the rest of us are not stupid, OK?

CITATIONS PLEASE!

 

 

--

Sincerely yours,

/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964

http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)

http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)

http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)

http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

 

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice

 

 

 

On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Joseph Mockaitis mockaitis1942@yahoo.com> wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

LET'S TAKE OUR HATS OF TO WALTER.  HE HAS DONE IT AGAIN.  GREAT INFORMATION AND THE PROPER PEOPLE TO SUE!!!!     --- On Tue, 11/22/11, Walter Burien WalterBurien@cafr1.com> wrote:     From: Walter Burien WalterBurien@cafr1.com> Subject: Audit of the IRS - 1999 & 2010 To: shirleyrickett@yahoo.com Date: Tuesday, November 22, 2011, 5:37 AM     CAFR1 NATIONAL POST       For those that have an interest, the following is the GAO (Government Accounting Office) 2010 audit of the IRS. The collection agency assigned by Congress to collect federal tax: http://CAFR1.com/STATES/FEDERAL-GAO-AUDIT-OF-IRS/FED-GAO-AUDIT-OF-IRS-FINANCIAL-STATEMENTS-2010.pdf The US Government started auditing the "Private" Collection agency of the IRS in 1992. Federal Government Agencies were audited from their inception. The audit of the "Private" IRS began long after it was contracted out as a collection agency contracted by Congress. The IRS puts out two sets of Annual Financial Reports. One for their collection obligations under contract with the US Congress (The Audit noted above) and their internal AFR showing their corporate structure and corporate identity (that one they keep under lock and key) You will note that every guideline that the IRS is supposed to follow is: "Recommended" or "Suggested" for voluntary compliance by the IRS establishing its status as a NGO (Non Government Organization). For actual Federal Government agencies the US Government "tells; instructs; requires; or mandates" what to do by US Code. For additional reference here is the 1999 GAO audit of the IRS: http://CAFR1.com/STATES/FEDERAL-GAO-AUDIT-OF-IRS/FED-GAO-AUDIT-OF-IRS-FINANCIAL-STATEMENTS1999.pdf So, if you have a problem with the IRS, don't fight the IRS, go after the "first line responsible party" the one who employes that private collection agency of the IRS under contract, the US Congress. If you do so, don't forget to motion for discovery to be provided in your case with the IRS's "Corporate" Annual Financial Report, you know, that one they keep under lock and key. One of the first rules of a civil action is "clear" and truthful disclosure of who the apposing party to that civil action is. False, or attempts for false representation on that point would in true light invalidate on its face any civil action by established law. Conjointly, federal or local courts in light of the above would have a tad bit of a conflict of interest out of financial self-interest enforcing collection activities of a private collection agency in which in part they were the beneficiary. (The Fox taking out a civil court action against the rancher to eat a certain percentage of the rancher's chickens, with the case being decided by the Fox's family back in the Fox den) Sent FYI from,   Walter Burien - CAFR1                 --