Amazing legal ingorance of Obama's defense in challenges to his candidacy -- and what I will do about the electoral college
From Dick Eastman
What must we remove, what repudiate, and what must we install to be rid of these Enumerated Powers?
Supposing the right thing were attainable, what would it look like -- how would it differ.
What constraints are lifted when the enumerated powers are eliminated?
What replacements will be necessary to fill the void left from this excision?
----- Original Message -----
From: Rocky Crossing Ranch/Sam Bitz
To: Dick Eastman <oldickeastman@q.com>
Sent: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 00:46:56 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: Amazing legal ingorance of Obama's defense in challenges to his candidacy -- and what I will do about the electoral college
water on your plan; however, you, as President would also have to negate the
alleged 17th Amendment (actually an "appendage") to the present Enumerated 1846
Version of "Constitution" in order to return to the NON-ENUMERATED PLAN devised
by the founding Framer DEPUTIES.
America is corrupted; but why not explain WHO corrupted it, HOW and WHEN.
devised their very unique NON-ENUMERATED SYSTEM OF PLENARY REPUBLICAN
GOVERNMENT, there was no such thing as private University Company Fraternal
Political Parties then in existence!
Pennsylvania Colonial Declaration"? It was one of the 14 original
Colonies, according to "those Representatives voting" on the Northwest
Territorial Ordinance of River Basin Ohio (Crown Company), July, 1787...of the
Vatican Empire and Crown Confederate Congress & Company of New York. Wow,
two separate and distinct "Congresses" convened and "voting" on the very same
day
; Continental Congress Deputies in Philadelphia and
the Confederate Congress Representatives in New York...of
actual record!
lawyer or lawyer-judge IF all "Enumerations" were once again suddenly removed
from all of our "written laws"? OR return them back to their original mandatory
"Republican Form" in order to be once again "On an equal footing in all respect
whatever with the Original Republican States of America"!
the "States"; NOT their SEAT of Plenary Republican government!
America. Do you recognize it Dick? As of now, we have only one of those original
"Republican Letters" remaining. It is still celebrated by some on the 4th of
July! Most all others were destroyed in the fires of 1812, excepting the Records
of the Colonial Debates and those copies held by the Framers and other private
parties.
topics; however like the majority of University Company-zonked public and
romance writers, you are using the wrong terminology to make your point and it
leads to no where. And that was the grand plan of the Vatican Empire &
Crown University Company
following the war of 1812. And it worked even
better than they anticipated, as they admit right their in their "Enumerated
Zionist Protocol Agenda".
Trail of that UNIVERSAL LEOPARD is ALWAYS ENUMERATED! From 1777 to present it
sure as hell is! And those inbred and interbred bastards even "speak in numbers"
in our forums!
Professors of Higher Education (high-school) claimed and instructed their students to be the "original Supreme Republican Declaration" emerging fromthat September 1787 Philadelphia Convention; simply download the presentenumerated Hickey & Company Version of The Constitution into your computer Word Program (This was originally done with pencil, paper and eraser)
July 4, 1776".
there was no such thing in law or fact as "The United States"...other than those
of King George III and his New York Confederate Operatives....as
"Enumerated"!
classroom exercise, sit back are review the instrument emerging from that 1787
Convention..now "Republican in Form" and in "Style (operation)"!
hand-written version of state Constitution" as well.
your message across to many folks and waking them out of their slumbers.
Hopefully its not too late. God bless
apply to the "Charter of Federal Appendages (erroneously called "Amendments")".
Remove the enumerations and you will then see that they are actually mere
"statements"!
----- Original Message -----From:Dick
Eastman
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 7:21
PM
Subject: Amazing legal ingorance of
Obama's defense in challenges to his candidacy -- and what I will do about the
electoral college
Obama name on the ballot is
challenged in Georgia. Obama's lawyers respond with this
argument:
“Presidential electors and Congress, not the state of Georgia, hold the
constitutional
responsibility for determining the qualifications of presidential
candidates."
However, the electors are chosen by these ballots. The system --
corrupted from the original intention of the Founding Fathers which was
that that people would vote for electors and the electors would
convene the Electoral College and find themselves a President. But the
way the system is organized now, parties caucus and put up electors who
are pre-committed to the party candidate -- but it is the ballots
in the primary that determines which candidate and thus which party and thus
which electors will caste their locked-in votes. Of course under this
system the Obama defense makes no sense at all. Congress has
nothing to do with the electors decision. And the electors have no power
until they are selected as electors. They are not Electors who go to the
Electoral College until they are selected -- in the case of Georgia by
ballot. The electors have not say because they are only candidates
to be electors. They cannot rule on who gets into the primary ballot
because no one becomes an elector for the electoral college until the election
results are officially counted and registered. The real authority
is the counties of Georgia which individually have the right to determine who
goes on their ballots. The design is a bad one. People have
been pretending that it makes sense when it does not. America should go
back to the original design -- the system under which Madison
and Jefferson were elected.
Obama's lawyer offer a second
argument:
“The election of President Obama by the presidential electors, confirmed by
Congress,
makes the documents and testimony sought by plaintiff
irrelevant."
What they are saying here is that once the Constitution has
been violated once and the
violation has not been checked by authority upholding the
Constitution, that the unconstitutional
act suddenly becomes above challenge. Yet we know that
Nancy Pelosi signed the confirmation
of Obama's qualification when in fact it was not
true.
Only a Harvard or Philadelphia lawyer would attempt to argue
out of that one.
But I was born in Philadelphia, and I am running for
President -- and the electoral system makes no allowance for a write-in
candidate like me - because a write-in can win but zero electors come
with him. It isn't said, but the political parties are a duopoly that
controls the supply of electors.
If, somehow, I am President on January 20, 1913 I sure as
heck am going to use the President's power to lead in legislation
get the original system restored in better form through a constitutional
amendment. It can't be done by executive order or under martial law --
but the president has power to cooperate or not cooperate with
Congress.
If I am president I will suspend Congress by martial law,
until my executive orders are completed and the necessary institutional
changes are in place and begin operating. Then Congress will be called
by me -- and will be instructed to draft their own legislation creating their
own version of each component of each of my reforms and passing them -- until
my emergency measures to change the course to what the people want, can be
adopted throught acts of Congress.
That's my plan.Dick EastmanYakima, WashingtonEastman/Lund We will give you the America you
want.
Eastman videos
oldickeastman@q.com