
Canadian Rights and Reedeoms are at Risk - An Important Notice Regarding Bill C-6
This is messed up, the Canadian bureaucracy appears to be using the economic crisis and political instability to mask an attempt to take over a huge part of our government.
On January 29th, 2009, the Canadian Minister of Health introduced Bill C-6 into the House of Commons. Similar to last year’s Bill C-52, this bill poses a grave threat to the Rights, Freedoms and Democratic processes all Canadians now have. The powers sought after in Bill C-6 again are hidden in what is meant to seem like a much needed Consumer Product Safety Act.
Bill C-6 will: |
|
|
|
When C-6 becomes law government agents will: |
|
|
|
With completely unchecked power will Health Canada bend to the bribery, and influence peddling of large corporate interests? Would they ever turn this power loose on the Canadian people? |
|
|
|
|
|
Why do bureaucrats need to bypass the Parliament and Senate approval process to create new laws? These processes are open and visible to public scrutiny. What don't they want us to see? |
|
|
|
Why do bureaucrats want search and seizure powers without being required to provide any reason or evidence of guilt or wrong doing? The Canadian Courts were put in place to protect Canadians and provide a third party review of all claims and actions against an innocent party. What are the bureaucrats planning that they don't want a judge to see? |
|
|
|
With the ability to levy fines in the millions of dollars, seize property and bank accounts without a warrant, and inject foreign laws into Canada without any oversight, is this new law designed to silence and discriminate against certain groups of Canadians or just to undo the democratic processes that our forefathers fought for and died to protect? |
|
|
|
If C-6 is allowed to become law, Health Canada's Brooks Claxton Building will become the dominant symbol of power and authority in Canada. Global corporate interests will become Canadian Law and the Canadian people will have no say in how they are governed. The democratic processes that have served us for more than a hundred years will not have the ability to protect us. |
|
|
|
|