JBN

THE GLOBAL PLANTATION - A REPSONSE TO THE VERACITY OF JOAN VEON’S ARTICLE.  http://www.newswithviews.com/Veon/joan52.htm

In the first instance I must say that Joan Veon is quite knowledgeable and has personally attended many international and regional organization meetings over the years. Her personal experience, observations, analytical skills and articulate conclusions are not to be taken lightly.

Joan Veon's article is generally correct but it is missing some important historical parts and operational pieces. The current and empiric name for the umbrella "plan" regarding "globalization" is called "sustainable development." Prostituted politicians and corporate heads are repeatedly heard parroting this phrase when it is well known and recognized that the phrase has no meaningful and useful definition. Its only real purpose is to induce other people to follow along with implicit faith. "Implicit faith belongs to fools..and it might be added that blind obedience belongs to rogues and not to honest men. See: Legal & Political Hermeneutics, Francis Lieber. Nevertheless, "sustainable development" has three primary components. Those primary components are: (1) economics, (2) natural resources, and (3) human development.

The history and stealthy implementation of sustainable development is over 110 years old now. It was masked by different propaganda catch phrases and names throughout that time period. The primary component parts were usually created and expanded under conditions of economic duress and orchestrated emergencies. That methodology remains today and has been used throughout human history to seriously alter or cause the dissolution of numerous Nations and States. The Roman Empire was particularly noted in historical writings for its colonization conquest tactics and its stealthy interventions into the domestic affairs of other Nations. If a targeted Nation was not subdued by outright military force and aggression, treaties and international agreements were used to subjugate the targeted Nation and its people. Rome used treaties to disarm and control Carthage and then destroyed the community and salted the soil.

There is nothing new under heaven. Stealthy innovations may have superficially changed the face of that rogue activity, but not its impacts and end results. The ultimate objective is "subjugation." In the end the targeted Nation remains in name only. General warnings were given about that methodology and what to watch out for. Only three examples will be needed and quoted here to show this point.

Emer de Vattel

“The constitution of a State and its laws are the foundation of public peace, the firm support of political authority, and the security for the liberty of the citizens. But this constitution is a mere dead letter, and the best laws are useless if they be not sacredly observed. It is therefore, the duty of a Nation to be ever on the watch that the laws be equally respected both by those who govern and by the people who are to be ruled by them. To attack the constitution of a State and to violate its laws is a capital crime against society; and if the persons who are guilty of it are those in authority, they add to this crime a perfidious abuse of the power confided to them. A Nation must uniformly put down such violations with all the vigor and vigilance which the importance of the case demands. The constitution and laws of the State are rarely attacked from the front; it is against secret and gradual attacks that a Nation must chiefly guard. Sudden resolutions strike men’s imaginations; their history is written, and their secret sources made known; but changes are overlooked when they come about insensibly by a series of steps which are scarcely noted. One would do a great service to Nations by showing from history how many States have thus changed their whole nature and lost their original constitution. The attention of peoples would be awakened, and thenceforth in realization of that excellent maxim, no less essential in politics than in morality, principiis obsta, they would not close their eyes to innovations which, though of little account in themselves, serve as so many steps to advance to higher and more disastrous undertakings.” See: The Law Of Nations Or The Principles Of Natural Law, Emer de Vattel, Book I, Chapter III, § 30.

Joseph Story.

"The fate of other republics, their rise, their progress, their decline, and their fall, are written but too legibly on the pages of history, if indeed they were not continually before us in the startling fragments of their ruins.  They have perished; and by their own hands.  Prosperity has enervated them; corruption has debased them; and a venal populace has consummated their destruction.  Alternately the prey of military chieftains at home, and of ambitious invaders from abroad, they have been sometimes cheated out of their liberties by servile demagogues; sometimes betrayed into a surrender of them by false patriots; and sometimes they have willingly sold them for a price to the despot, who has bidden highest for his victims.  They have disregarded the warning voice of their best statesmen; and have persecuted, and driven from office their truest friends.  They have listened to the fawning sycophant, and the base calumniator of the wise and good.

 They have reverenced power more in its high abuses and summary movements, than in its calm and constitutional energy, when it dispensed blessings with an unseen, but liberal hand.  They have surrendered to faction, what belonged to the country.  Patronage and party, the triumph of leaders, and the discontents of a day, have outweighed all solid principles and institutions of government. Such are the melancholy lessons of the past history of republics down to our own." See: Commentaries on the United States Constitution, Joseph Story, Conclusion.

John M. Keynes

“By a continuing process of inflation, governments can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part of the wealth of its citizens.  There is no subtler, no surer means of overturning the existing basis of society than to debauch the currency. The process engages all the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction, and does it in such a manner which not one man in a million is able to diagnose.” See: The Economic Consequences Of Peace, John Maynard Keynes (1920)

The Federal Reserve monopoly and its hypothecation system was only one component of the century old "sustainable development" scheme. "Hypothecate", which is the word that is specifically used in the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, was a long recognized and statutory felony fraud before its institutionalization in that Act. It is nothing more and nothing less than creating pretended wealth out of thin air. The U.S. economy and people were subjected to economic crisis on three separate but successive occasions from 1892 through 1908 and from that same outlawed activity. That series of created economic crisis’ gave rise to an emergency during the Taft administration. It was that series of economic emergencies that provided the atmosphere for change. One of the changes included withdrawing common (now public) lands in the U.S. from settlement and extinguishing any private claims to natural resources located on those lands (development & natural resources)

 Then there was proposed legislation to create and implement an "international" monetary system. That proposed international monetary Act failed because the States effectively controlled the Senate at the time and directed the Senators to veto the Act. The domestic economic facility, the Federal Reserve, however, succeeded.

The 16th and 17th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution quickly followed. Those amendments eliminated the State's powers and control over the centralization and internationalization process.

I will not go through the virtually unregulated Edge Banking Act of 1917, the League of Nations, Missouri v. Holland where treaties could usurp the powers reserved to the States, the collapse of the stock market in October of 1929, the Emergency Banking Relief Act of March 1933 where war powers were used against the people to expropriate their intrinsically valuable coin money to pay foreign debts and what became known as the "balance of payments", etc. It was however, the progressivist administration of F. D. Roosevelt that put "internationalization", now called "globalization", back onto the front burner of the political agenda.

To briefly explain the name changes in the Marx - Engles inimical political revolution, "collectivism" or "communism" fell to disfavor and was renamed as the "progressivist" movement in the early 1900s. (Fredric Bastiat gave a very clear description of the seriously defects in "collective communism" in his noted writing "The Law.") "Progressivism" fell to disfavor and was renamed as the "socialism" movement after World War II. "Socialism" fell to disfavor and it has now gone back to being called "collectivism." The word "collective" is repeatedly used in writings on sustainable development and by politicians promoting the scheme.

In like manner and to add some points of reference, the first "Declaration of Interdependence was signed and issued in the mid 1930s during the progressivist FDR administration. The second "Declaration of Interdependence" was signed and issued in January of 1976, just months before the second amendment to the ("interdependent") Bretton Woods Agreement was ratified. Public Law 94-564. In the sequence of events, "independence" fell to "interdependence" and then "interdependence" fell to "dependence." The engine of those innovations was always "economics", the first principle component of "sustainable development."

With Missouri v. Holland and the several States being subjugated under the international belt of power, FDR wanted more power for the collectivist movement. The Great Depression and widespread duress was in full motion at the time, so he negotiated a trade deal with communist Russia without the consent of the Senate. The matter went to the Supreme Court in U.S. v. Belmont (1937) where the activist court determined that the president did not need the Senate or other Congressional ratification for a valid and binding international agreement. This activist doctrine was repeated in U.S. v. Pink in 1942. The basic tools for unfettered "internationalization" were then neatly tucked into the box of political powers.

It was under this darkly clouded atmosphere of depression and World War II that gave rise to the completely autonomous United Nations and to the completely autonomous Bretton Woods sisters, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (World Bank). Two principal negotiators in setting up these autonomous institutions were Alger Hiss, a well know and recognized communist, and the little known Harry Dexter White in the U.S. Treasury Department (also first appointed Director of the IMF), whose parents immigrated from communist Russia. These entities and their extensive political powers were secretly negotiated under the Yalta Agreement. Harry White pursued an "adjustable" exchange rate in the IMF Charter while John Keynes pursued the "fixed value exchange rate." See" IMF Working Paper WP/06/6, "American In The Shadows." Harry White succeeded in laying the groundwork for the floating exchange rate now

 used for hypothecated and irredeemable bank paper and book entry credit.

U.N. sub-agencies were also created and expanded to include the United Nations Education, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) that would implement and oversee social engineering test projects such as the Man & Biosphere Program. Then there were the United Nations Development Program (UNDP) and the United Nations Environmental Program (UNEP) to oversee concessional development projects and environmental (natural resources) projects in member countries. These latter two autonomous agencies were created during the economic duress and emergency in the mid 1960s when Congress completely debased U.S. coins and dishonored the Federal Reserve notes. The IMF's Special Drawing Rights system (first amendment to Bretton Woods Agreement) was also created at this time to take over certain political powers vested in Congress.

Another financial collapse occurred in the early to mid 1970s. Several international matters came through the back door while many people were under economic duress and their attentions were diverted. These international treaties, agreements and programs included such things as the the U.N. Stockholm Agreement on "Human Environment"; the treaty based Endangered Species Act; the Man & Biosphere Program, and of course, the second Declaration of Interdependence of January 1976 and the second amendment to the Bretton Woods Agreement.

These numerous U.N. development and environmental programs and their related local or regional projects, would of course require substantial funds and infusions of bank credit which would be channeled through the international Bretton Woods sisters or other multinational and regional development banks, such as the African Development Bank, Asian Development Bank, European Development Bank, etc. The contracts to finance these international projects were craftily drawn to deceive the debtor and induce the politicians in the targeted Nation to abdicate substantial political and economic powers over the particular project area and of the Nation or State as a whole. These are called "concessions" or "concessional lending." This joint venture financing activity would eventually evolve into the "Brady Plan" (1989) and by amendment in 1992, would authorize the "forced displacement of populations.” The "Brady Plan" included: debt for debt swaps, debt for equity

 swaps, and debt for nature swaps.

It was well know by the time that the Brady Plan was instituted in 1989 that: “There is no mathematical solution to the debt crisis.” Public Law 98-181, 97 Stat. 1153, House Report 98-175), and  “There is no market solution to the debt problem.”(See: Market-Based Debt Reduction For Developing Countries, The World Bank, pg. 44) As such, the Brady Plan was created to address the expected insolvency of the targeted Nation and to settle the "balance of payments."

As but one of many examples, the Brady Plan was used during the economic collapse of Mexico between 1994 and 1996 and resulted in the Chiapa revolution when the debtor politicians agreed to take and expropriate the lands and natural resources of the native people through a swap agreement. See: GAO Report GAO/GGD-96-95, "Mexico's Financial Crisis. The IMF and World Bank participated in that swap activity and effectively incited the Chiapa revolution with U.S. taxpayer funds in hand. A similar incident occurred in Costa Rica but it did not rise to violent revolution.

Coming back to recent events, the Federal Reserve started using the "swap facilities" under Federal Reserve Regulation A late last year and has continued those swap transactions throughout this year, 2008. This was all aristocratically done through an amendment to Regulation A without public comment, and of course, was intended to save certain favored financial institutions and investment firms from their own chicanery and lust for profit. This series of swaps and credit infusion are now causing an increase in inflation and the depreciation of the objective purchasing value of the Federal Reserve Notes (FRN). Almost everyone is experiencing some type of the damage - rising cost of living and doing business.

Like the Federal Reserve itself, the autonomous IMF is currently in the process of seeking the "third" amendment to the IMF Articles of Agreement. It is also asserting power over the U.S. now because of the current and expanding economic collapse of the Bretton Woods floating bank credit system. The economic "shocks" and "growth-oriented adjustments" that are now on the planning table will undoubtedly result in further erosion of political powers in the U.S. The autonomous international controller and instrumentality is calling the bill due and settlement of accounts. What they officially refer to as "human resources” and "institutional units" in their accounting books are dehumanized to mere numbers and statistical references and are effectively immaterial in the eyes and objectives of the system manipulators.

In short, there are two very observable principle objectives in the overall scheme and in the systematic maneuvers. Those two objectives are "power" and "profit." The principal artificial entities implementing the scheme are either autonomous or monopoly enterprises and they are aristocratic in their structure and function. They are not "republican in form" as might be required by the U.S. Constitution and they "are" undoubtedly wielding usurped political powers in the U.S. and elsewhere. The words "Treaties which shall be made, UNDER authority of the United States" have no meaning to or effect in these aristocratic institutions. See: U.S. Constitution Article VI, Clause 2. The prostituted politicians currently in public office will do nothing meaningful to correct their own breach of duty and obligation much less to correct these usurpations.

As emphatically stated by the World Bank when specifically addressing the impacts of the de facto economic component:

“The civil servant had either to survive by lowering his standard of ethics, performance, and dutifulness or remain upright and perish.  He chose to survive.”  (See: World Development Report 1995 - Workers in an Integrating World, The World Bank, pg. 92)

Is Joan Veon correct in her general observation that the U.S. is being systematically brought down to a point of "dissolution", as described by John Locke in his Second Treatise on the True, Original Extent And End Of Civil Government, Chapter 19? The answer should be "self evident" as was stated in the "Declaration of Independence" of 1776. They are trying to move further toward their delusional "global plantation" where "the bookkeeper can be king" over all human and natural resources. Even though the entities are exercising political powers, none of those entities or their offices are mentioned in the ordained Constitution and they do not function under its high and perfect limitations and obligations - and they never will.

From:  gnc-prvtctzns@isoc.net