The United States has, likewise, granted this right to Mexican Border Guards in their just signed new border agreement on terrorism, and which U.S. Customs and Border Protection Commissioner Ralph Basham stated, “[This] agreement represents a mutual desire of the United States and Mexico to protect their people and economies.”

This latest move by the American Attorney General Gonzales is based upon Canada’s recent decision, for the first time in their history, to allow the arming of their Border Guards, and as we can read as reported by the Globe and Mail News Service:

"The first of Canada's border guards to be authorized to carry weapons on the job graduated Friday after attending training in both Ottawa and Chilliwack, B.C.

The government hopes to have at least 250 and 300 border guards armed and on the job by August 2008, with hundreds more added in each of the following years.

The 2006 federal budget provided the border services agency with $101-million over two years to begin the process of providing border services officers with firearms."

The convoluted logic of Attorney General Gonzales, and as it pertains to the rights of the American people, were best stated by himself in testimony before the United States Senate this year when he spoke on what was once the American’s most cherished right of habeas corpus by stating:

"The fact that the Constitution — again, there is no express grant of habeas in the Constitution. There is a prohibition against taking it away."

These FSB reports further point out that these new rights for foreign border guards to begin killing fleeing American citizens is consistent with the legal thinking of Attorney General Gonzales, and has been further verified by the American Civil Liberties Union, and who stated in their report on the him:

"As White House counsel, Alberto Gonzales was pivotal in getting the USA Patriot Act drafted and rapidly passed through Congress. The Patriot Act is a law that allows officials unchecked license to investigate, arrest, detain and interrogate anyone on the grounds of suspicion of terrorism.

Gonzales first gained national notoriety by paving the legal groundwork that led to the torture of US detainees at Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo and other sites. He authored a 2002 memo to the President in which he termed the war on terror a "new kind of war" that makes the Geneva Convention international standards for treatment of prisoners "obsolete" and "quaint.”

Though illogical, these reports state that Attorney General Gonzales’ decision to allow the killing of Americans fleeing their country is consistent with his prior views that because the United States is such a ‘good’ Nation it can be ‘automatically assumed’ that anyone found trying to cross a border ‘undetected’ must, therefore, be a terrorist.

In an America currently being ruled by the dictate of what are called Executive Orders by their President, the views of the present American War Administration can best be summed by President Bush himself, and as we can read as quoted by Washington’s Capital Hill Blues’ News Service in this exchange between Bush and his aides:

"GOP leaders told Bush that his hardcore push to renew the more onerous provisions of the act could further alienate conservatives still mad at the President from his botched attempt to nominate White House Counsel Harriet Miers to the Supreme Court.

“I don’t give a goddamn,” Bush retorted. “I’m the President and the Commander-in-Chief. Do it my way.”

“Mr. President,” one aide in the meeting said. “There is a valid case that the provisions in this law undermine the Constitution.”

“Stop throwing the Constitution in my face,” Bush screamed back. “It’s just a goddamned piece of paper!”

Even more frightening, perhaps, to the American people are the horrific new powers just granted Attorney General Gonzales by the US Congress which allows him, and him alone, to bypass the United States Federal Court System to seek the immediate execution of any American citizen, and as we can read as reported by the Associated Press News Service:

"Today's paper sports a headline that would almost be laughable were it not so deadly serious. It announces that under a little noticed provision of the Patriot Act, the attorney general is seeking to exercise powers granted to him to "fast track" state executions of prisoners on death row.

Alberto Gonzales? A man whose judgment has been questioned by friend and foe alike, who remains in his job only because his lame duck boss is impervious to criticism, now given new life-and-death power? This at a time when DNA evidence has repeatedly been used to prove the imperfections of the system of determining guilt, and medical questions about lethal injection as a method of execution have led to moratoriums in several states?

The new provision is the latest chapter of the ongoing effort by death penalty proponents to speed up the period between a sentence of death and its execution, which in some states can take not years, but decades. Under an earlier version of the law, new limits were established requiring a prisoner sentenced to death under state law to seek review in federal courts within a year (now six months) of the time he has exhausted his state appeals, and imposing time limits on how long federal district judges and appellate courts could take to decide the cases. The catch was that the states had to establish that they were providing adequate assistance of counsel in state courts, which they have failed to do, according to the federal courts charged to review these claims.

What the new law does is take that decision-making authority away from the federal courts and invest it in the attorney general."

Though lost upon the American people themselves, the terrifying new law they are now living under, called The Patriot Act, and which allows to their War Leaders, including Attorney General Gonzales, to rule by dictate alone, is based upon the Nazi German’s law that brought Adolph Hitler to power:

"The Enabling Act was a special power allowed by the Weimar Constitution to give the Chancellor [Hitler] the power to pass laws by decree without the involvement of the Reichstag. These special powers would remain in effect for four years, after which time they were eligible to be renewed."

It is interesting to note that the like the Nazi German Enabling Act, the United States Patriot Act was, likewise, due for expiration after 4 years after being signed into law by President Bush on October 26, 2001 after the attacks on America on September 11, 2001:

"Many of the act's provisions were to sunset beginning December 31, 2005, approximately 4 years after its passage."

To the greatest understanding of the vast similarities between the present United States and last centuries Nazi Empire, one look no further than the history of the Bush Family itself, and as we can read as reported by Britain’s Guardian News Service in their article since banned in the United States:

"George Bush's grandfather, the late US senator Prescott Bush, was a director and shareholder of companies that profited from their involvement with the financial backers of Nazi Germany.

The Guardian has obtained confirmation from newly discovered files in the US National Archives that a firm of which Prescott Bush was a director was involved with the financial architects of Nazism.

His business dealings, which continued until his company's assets were seized in 1942 under the Trading with the Enemy Act, has led more than 60 years later to a civil action for damages being brought in Germany against the Bush family by two former slave labourers at Auschwitz and to a hum of pre-election controversy.

Rumours of a link between the US first family and the Nazi war machine have circulated for decades. Now the Guardian can reveal how repercussions of events that culminated in action under the Trading with the Enemy Act are still being felt by today's president

George Bush's grandfather, the late US senator Prescott Bush, was a director and shareholder of companies that profited from their involvement with the financial backers of Nazi Germany.

The Guardian has obtained confirmation from newly discovered files in the US National Archives that a firm of which Prescott Bush was a director was involved with the financial architects of Nazism.

His business dealings, which continued until his company's assets were seized in 1942 under the Trading with the Enemy Act, has led more than 60 years later to a civil action for damages being brought in Germany against the Bush family by two former slave labourers at Auschwitz and to a hum of pre-election controversy.

The evidence has also prompted one former US Nazi war crimes prosecutor to argue that the late senator's action should have been grounds for prosecution for giving aid and comfort to the enemy.

The debate over Prescott Bush's behaviour has been bubbling under the surface for some time. There has been a steady internet chatter about the "Bush/Nazi" connection, much of it inaccurate and unfair. But the new documents, many of which were only declassified last year, show that even after America had entered the war and when there was already significant information about the Nazis' plans and policies, he worked for and profited from companies closely involved with the very German businesses that financed Hitler's rise to power. It has also been suggested that the money he made from these dealings helped to establish the Bush family fortune and set up its political dynasty.

Remarkably, little of Bush's dealings with Germany has received public scrutiny, partly because of the secret status of the documentation involving him. But now the multibillion dollar legal action for damages by two Holocaust survivors against the Bush family, and the imminent publication of three books on the subject are threatening to make Prescott Bush's business history an uncomfortable issue for his grandson, George W, as he seeks re-election."

Three days ago President Putin ordered the resumption of Russian strategic nuclear bomber flights against the United States and its Allies….the American people should begin asking themselves why, and when finding the answer begin their immediate preparations for Total War.

[Ed. Note: The United States government actively seeks to find, and silence, any and all opinions about the United States except those coming from authorized government and/or affiliated sources, of which we are not one. No interviews are granted and very little personal information is given about our contributors, or their sources, to protect their safety.]