FourWinds10.com - Delivering Truth Around the World
Custom Search

John Stuart: Foreclosure Help

Smaller Font Larger Font RSS 2.0

 

 We need to change our way of thinking about US law and how to make the judges behave. Only two things trump the Constitution, contracts and treaties, which are really just a contract. If we hit the judge with treaty instead of law he is screwed. Judges NEVER rule against treaty, the Feds attack if they do.

 

 We need to alter the Replevin with treaty and international law to finalize the requirement that the bank cancel the Note. Then the judge WILL require the Note to be sequestered and cancel it if the banks win. The banks will walk instead of canceling the Note.

 

 THIS IS A BIG DEAL. Read the following until it makes complete sense and you can teach it to someone.

 

 A quick explanation of the loan issue:

 "A debt evidenced by a Note" as stated in the Deed of Trust the Note does not exist to a court if the court does not see the Note.

 

 Maxims of Law and Court rules:

 Accordingly, without the ACTUAL Note being presented to the court, there is no Note.

 

 If there is no Note, the debt is not evidenced.

 If the debt is not evidenced, there is no debt.

 If there is no debt, there is no loan.

 

 The court CANNOT just presume there is a loan when the bank is the Defendant; presumptions are for Plaintiffs, not Defendants.

 

 If a Plaintiff claims there is no loan, then the Defendant MUST prove there is a loan by proving there is evidence of a debt, which in this case can ONLY be the Note.

 

 Therefore, WHERE IS THE LOAN? SHOW ME THE LOAN!!!

 

 If the judge gets the Note, he must sequester the Note to protect the parties and the court since it is the responsibility of the court to remove the Note from commerce if the bank is allowed to foreclose pursuant to a court order.

 

 Guys, it really is this simple and every time a court rules against this it is nothing more than fraud being committed by a corrupt judge.

 

 Even if our corrupt politicians give the banks some type of immunity it is still a violation of international treaty and law in accordance with countries agreements on international commerce.

 

Do you think Russia or Japan or China want the banks keeping their Notes when they pay off their loans.

 

 We need to start hitting the courts with violations of international treaties since they trump US law and the constitution per the constitution. If we tell the judge his ruling is a violation of international law and he is purposefully violating a treaty and he does nothing about it, we can report him to the Hague instead of some bias judicial committee. The Hague hates US judges as much as we do.

 =================

 For more information to save your home visit:

 http://ShowMeTheLoan.net

 * To SEE our FIRST SUCCESS Story click on "Resources"

 * Watch the Videos

 * Join the Forum

 * Click on "TalkShoe" Or "Online Radio" to listen to previous talks.

 * Check out the "Documents" link, a wealth of information.

 * Click on "Webcast" to see how you can attend live classes with John on Sundays at 1PM EST and Tuesdays at 9PM EST.

 * John is also on a TalkShoe conference call every Sunday at 8PM EST;

 724-444-7444 Pin: 399044#

 

 Please note, John does Not charge for "Any" of this it is totally FREE! He survives purely on donations, please help him to continue his research to help people that need his expertise.

 

 Donate to John Stuart at http://ShowMeTheLoan.net