FourWinds10.com - Delivering Truth Around the World
Custom Search

FLYNN EVIDENCE REVEALS DIRTY TACTICS OF PROSECUTOR FROM MUELLER'S TEA

TTN

Smaller Font Larger Font RSS 2.0

5-5-20

The new bombshell evidence revealed in recently released Michael Flynn documents also casts doubt on the actions of a federal prosecutor who served on Special Counsel Robert Mueller's team.

 

Federal Judge Emmet G. Sullivan issued a standing order in the Flynn case to produce all evidence in the government’s possession “that is favorable to defendant and material either to defendant’s guilt or punishment.”

 

The newly released evidence that falls under this order was never presented by federal prosecutor Brandon Van Grack, and he categorically denied it even existed.

 

According to Fox News:

What Van Grack didn’t inform the court about – and didn’t provide to Flynn – was the newly unsealed January 4, 2017 "Closing Communication" from the FBI Washington Field Office, which recommended the FBI close its investigation of Flynn, as its exhaustive search through government databases “did not yield any information on which to predicate further investigative efforts."

 

Van Grack also failed to provide evidence to Flynn’s attorneys that anti-Trump former FBI agent Peter Strzok then immediately intervened and instructed the FBI case manager handling the Flynn investigation to keep the probe open, followed by indicators that the bureau would seek to investigate Flynn for possible violations of an obscure 18th century law known as the Logan Act -- which has never been utilized in a modern prosecution.

 

Another Strzok text mentions that the FBI’s "7th floor" – meaning FBI leadership – may have been involved in the decision to keep the Flynn case alive.

 

Instead, Van Grack characterized Flynn’s alleged false statements as critical to the FBI’s “legitimate and significant investigation into whether individuals associated with the campaign of then-candidate Donald J. Trump were coordinating with the Russian government in its activities to interfere with the 2016 presidential election.”

Van Grack also argued to the court that Flynn's communications with Russia were critical to the inquiry and that his false statements to the FBI were material. The new documents prove these statements to be false.

 

Flynn's communications with Russia were never proven to be made with the intent to harm the United States.

https://trumptrainnews.com/articles/flynn-evidence-reveals-dirty-tactics-of-prosecutor-from-mueller-s-team