SORCHA FAAL: Democrats SCREAM AND WAIL After Supreme Court “Return Authority To The People” Ruling
Sorcha Faal
An informative new Security Council (SC) report circulating in the Kremlin today first noting Pope Francis expressed readiness to go to Moscow in order to meet with President Putin in order to discuss a peaceful settlement of the “Special De-Nazification Operation” to liberate Ukraine, says in quick reply to this overture, it saw Security Council Deputy Chairman Dmitry Medvedev factually stating: “Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky does not need any peaceful settlement...For him, peace is the end...Zelensky in the future will keep begging the West for money and weapons, trying to prove he is still in the game, that he is the hope of the liberal world, that he is the last stronghold of European democracy which a bear in a cotton-padded jacket wants to tear apart”.
Bolstered into fantastical delusions of grandeur by their Western colonial overlords, this report notes, Director Alexey Danilov of the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council confirmed as true the statement made by Deputy Chairman Medvedev when he said that, instead of a peace treaty, Kiev is only prepared to sign a document with Moscow that would finalize Russia’s defeat, and declared: “With Russia we can only sign an act of its capitulation…The sooner they do it, the better it will be for their country”—a declaration of lunacy immediately joined by top President Zelensky adviser Alexey Arestovich proclaiming like a madman: “There will be no peace treaty with Russia…There will only be the capitulation of the Russian Federation”.
As to why Ukraine doesn’t want peace with Russia, this report continues, is because the conflict has nothing at all to do with them, rather it’s a full fledged war on Russia by the United States—a factual reality best explained last evening by America’s most watched newsman Fox News host Tucker Carlson, who truthfully revealed that “the Ukraine war is the inevitable end stage of Russiagate”, and stated:
Here's a happy memory. By breakfast, really even brunch, on Election Day 2016, virtually nobody in Washington, D.C. thought Donald Trump could win, and they didn't think that because the entire press corps had been telling them for months that Trump had, as they always put it, literally no chance—not even as an abstract, theoretical matter.
This wasn't actually a race. In fact, come November 8th, you'll remember this. Donald Trump was going to be drowned by a towering blue tsunami and swept away forever, along with the rest of the Republican Party — the collaborators, anyway—and polling numbers seemed to confirm that this was going to happen and so, by the way, did the private betting markets. At least one of those markets had set the spread at 80-20 for Hillary Clinton that morning.
In the end, of course, they were not only wrong, they were hilariously wrong. By midnight, Trump had won and a lot of highly educated, extremely well credentialed people suddenly looked ridiculous. Hillary Clinton herself was so shocked by the results that night that she refused to give a concession speech. She went to bed hoping it was just a dream.
Now, you probably remember all of that very well, but it was what happened next in the days between the election and Thanksgiving that it turns out in a lot of ways was much more important.
What happened during that period set the course for where we are right now. Where we are right now is speeding toward one of the great disasters in our history.
So, the leaders of the Democratic Party couldn't, in effect, handle the outcome of the 2016 election. They snapped under the strain of it, under the crushed expectation.
But rather than look inward and assess their own role in the disaster —"What did we do wrong? Why did voters reject us?" and other questions that emotionally mature adults might have asked — Democratic leaders instead immediately set out to find somebody else to blame for the election results. And soon they settled on Russia.
If you wanted to save Ukraine, its people, its infrastructure, its nation, you would push for a settlement now. You would have done it two months ago, but they're not doing that. They've rejected it out of hand.
So that's not their goal, saving Ukraine, saving human lives. No, that's not their goal. Instead, the war in Ukraine is designed to cause regime change in Moscow. They want to topple the Russian government. That would be payback for the 2016 election.
So, this is the logical, maybe the inevitable end stage of Russiagate.
Now, we should have seen this coming because they said it out loud years ago. Here's Adam Schiff from two years ago, predicting it, saying it.
SCHIFF:The United States aids Ukraine and her people so that we can fight Russia over there and we don't have to fight Russia here.
As a consequence of these maniacal godless socialist Democrats declaring their jihad against Russia, this report details, they’ve turned America into what is being called “Inflation Nation” that’s effectively destroying the lives of all of it citizens—is an economic destruction so complete the crucial S&P stock measure has plunged to its lowest level since 1939, the year that World War II started—and in viewing this destruction, it caused former US House Speaker Newt Gingrich to predict this past week that Republicans could pick up to as many as 70 seats and would win back both the House and the Senate.
With American political experts now warning that the “red wave” about to strike socialist Democrats in the 2022 midterm election has turned into a “red tsunami”, this report notes, the socialist Democrats’ scheme to use the 6 January protests to stave off a crushing defeat was just hit by Axios reporting: “The Jan. 6 committee's intentional effort to build suspense for its blockbuster hearings is being undercut by a deluge of unauthorized media leaks...They undercut what Axios has learned was a committee goal: building drama, mystery — and widespread public interest — ahead of hearings slated for June and the release of its report later this summer...They fear they'll breed complacency in a country already distracted by inflation, Ukraine and the lingering coronavirus pandemic”—and is an already failed scheme by socialist Democrats to turn the 6 January protests into a cable news televised mystery drama no one in America really cares about noticed with alarm yesterday by the leftist Washington Post, who, in their article “Brace Yourselves: The Democrats Need The Midterms To Be A Mudfight”, issued the dire warning: “It is just six months until the midterms, and Democrats are still trying to figure out what to tell voters...That’s a terrible sign for a party that controls all the levers of power in Washington...So brace yourselves, Republicans...Because the last hope of drowning politicos everywhere is fear and loathing, and we’re already seeing the signs that that’s where the Democrats are headed”.
Barely six hours after the leftist Washington Post issued its dire “mudfight” warning yesterday afternoon, this report continues, an avalanche of articles began appearing like “Barricades Erected at Supreme Court After Reported Leak of Draft Decision Overturning Roe v. Wade; Hundreds of Protesters Start to Gather at Court” and “Democrats SCREAM AND WAIL Like Demons After News Breaks that SCOTUS Is Tossing Roe v Wade”—all of which were in direct response to the bombshell Politico article “Supreme Court Has Voted To Overturn Abortion Rights, Draft Opinion Shows”—and about which the authoritative and highly influential Scotusblog posted the message:
Two final thoughts.
1. Politico reports that the 5 original votes to overturn Roe are “unchanged as of this week,” but does not report (and the leaker would know) that they have all said they will join the Alito opinion. At least 1 is apparently uncommitted. Hence the leak?
2. Those interested in who leaked the draft should wonder why Alexander Ward — a national security reporter— shares the byline. The leaker would insist that their identity be incredibly tightly held. Politico would not assign someone who didn’t have to be on the story.
In the draft opinionthat runs 98-pages, including a 31-page appendix of historical State abortion laws, this report details, it is a document replete with citations to previous court decisions, books and other authorities, including 118-footnotes, and whose author Supreme Court Associate Justice Samuel Alito writes in its final ruling: “Roe was egregiously wrong from the start...Its reasoning was exceptionally weak, and the decision has had damaging consequences...And far from bringing about a national settlement of the abortion issue, Roe and Casey have enflamed debate and deepened division...The Constitution makes no reference to abortion, and no such right is implicitly protected by any constitutional provision...The Constitution does not prohibit the citizens of each State from regulating or prohibiting abortion...We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled...We now overrule those decisions and return that authority to the people and their elected representatives”.
Most critical to note about this draft opinion, this report explains, is Politico revealing: “How Chief Justice John Roberts will ultimately vote, and whether he will join an already written opinion or draft his own, is unclear”—a revelation giving substance to the belief that this draft opinion was leaked in order to put pressure on Chief Justice Roberts—is a near unprecedented leak of a Supreme Court ruling matching the leak of its original 1973 ruling allowing abortion before it was officially published—if confirmed as being truth, the leftist New York Times factually notes: “If Roe is overturned, would abortion become illegal everywhere?...No...Individual states would decide whether and when abortions would be legal”—and is a fact every American should already have been taught about as school children, specifically because each of the individual States that comprise America are their own separate entities allowed to make its own laws as its citizens see fit.
As historians will document in future times, this report concludes, the Supreme Court ruling to “return authority to the people and their elected representatives” is exactly one of the main goals of the special operation to liberate Ukraine, whose citizens have been forced to live under a dictatorial Nazi regime fully supported by the Western colonial powers—and in the latest urgent war bulletins issued by the Ministry of Defense (MoD) to accomplish this goal, sees the most notable of them being:
[Note: Some words and/or phrases appearing in quotes in this report are English language approximations of Russian words/phrases having no exact counterpart.]
May 3, 2022 © EU and US all rights reserved. Permission to use this report in its entirety is granted under the condition it is linked to its original source at WhatDoesItMean.Com. Freebase content licensed under CC-BY and GFDL.
[Note: Many governments and their intelligence services actively campaign against the information found in these reports so as not to alarm their citizens about the many catastrophic Earth changes and events to come, a stance that the Sisters of Sorcha Faal strongly disagree with in believing that it is every human being’s right to know the truth. Due to our mission’s conflicts with that of those governments, the responses of their ‘agents’ has been a longstanding misinformation/misdirection campaign designed to discredit us, and others like us, that is exampled in numerous places, including HERE.]
[Note: The WhatDoesItMean.com website was created for and donated to the Sisters of Sorcha Faal in 2003 by a small group of American computer experts led by the late global technology guru Wayne Green (1922-2013) to counter the propaganda being used by the West to promote their illegal 2003 invasion of Iraq.]
[Note: The word Kremlin (fortress inside a city) as used in this report refers to Russian citadels, including in Moscow, having cathedral
s wherein female Schema monks (Orthodox nuns) reside, many of whom are devoted to the mission of the Sisters of Sorcha Faal.]
SEE VIDEO
https://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index3907.htm