10 states now have more on Welfare than Working!
David L. Adams
DAVID M. ADAM, JR.
4435 N.PERSHING DRIVE #709 ARLINGTON,VIRGINIA 22203 USA
c/o ADD INTERNATIONAL,LLC.-PRES.& CEO in FINANCE and FUNDING for OVER 55 YEARS IN WASHINGTON,D.C.
TEL.# 1-703 2431999
SKYPE:addintlusa
EMAIL :addintlusa@comcast.net
This is what bothers a lot of people about Trump. He won't accept a can't do attitude, or inexperienced, incompetent performance. He will get results, it just might not be smooth or pretty. Here are some amazing stats: Make sure you read to the bottom. An eye opener! (Or should be!)
1. California New Mexico Mississippi Alabama Illinois Kentucky Ohio New York Maine South Carolina
These 10 States now have More People on Welfare than they do Employed!
2. Last month, the Senate Budget Committee reports that in fiscal year 2012, between food stamps, housing support, child care, Medicaid and other benefits, the average U.S. Household below the poverty line received $168.00 a day in government support. What's the problem with that much support? Well, the median household income in America is just over $50,000, which averages out to $137.13 a day.
To put it another way, being on welfare now pays the equivalent of $30.00 an hour for 40 hour week, while the average job pays $24.00 an hour.
3. Check the last set of statistics!!
The percentage of each past president's cabinet who had worked in the private business sector prior to their appointment to the cabinet. You know what the private business sector is: A real-life business not a government job.
Here are the percentages:
38% T. Roosevelt 40% Taft 52% Wilson 49% Harding 48% Coolidge 42% Hoover 50% F. D. Roosevelt 50% Truman 57% Eisenhower 30% Kennedy 47% Johnson 53% Nixon 42% Ford 32% Carter 56% Reagan 51% GH Bush 39% Clinton 55% GW Bush 8% Obama
This helps explain the bias, if not the incompetence, of the last administration: ONLY 8% of them have ever worked in private business! That's right! Only eight percent - the least, by far, of the last 19 presidents! And these people tried to tell our corporations how to run their businesses? How can the president of a major nation and society, the one with the most successful economic system in world history, stand and talk about business when he's never worked for one? Or about jobs when he has never really had one? And, when it's the same for 92% of his senior staff and closest advisers? They've spent most of their time in academia, government, and/or non-profit jobs or as "community organizers."