Intelligence Agency (CIA) terrorists operating in the World today.

According to these reports, upon Iran being “warned” by Pakistani intelligence officials that the CIA backed Jundallah terrorist group leader Abdolmalek Rigi was on a flight leaving Afghanistan, President Ahmadinejad ordered the Iranian Air Force to “peruse, intercept and force to land” the plane Rigi was on. 

Upon Iranian Air Force fighter jets intercepting the plane carrying Rigi, US fighter jets were put into the air to protect Rigi, but upon nearing Iranian air space, and having been fired on by Iranian Republican Guard ground-to-air missile batteries, the Americans “with sudden haste” broke off the fight and returned to their base while the plane carrying Rigi was forced to land in the Iranian city of Bandar Abbas where he was then captured.

To the Iranians capture of this most wanted of the CIA’s terrorist leaders we can read as reported by Iran’s Press TV News Service in their report titled “Rigi planned to meet Holbrooke in Kyrgyzstan”, and which says:

“The captured ringleader of the Jundallah terrorist group, Abdolmalek Rigi, was scheduled to meet US special envoy for Afghanistan and Pakistan Richard Holbrooke at the Manas Air Base for talks on waging an insurgency against the Islamic Republic of Iran, a journalist says.

Rigi had planned to meet a high-profile US official at the Manas Air Base near Kyrgyzstan's capital Bishkek.

This senior US official must have been Holbrooke, who was in Kyrgyzstan to visit the only US air base in Central Asia, the IRNA news agency quoted journalist Wayne Madsen as saying on Saturday.

In a televised confession on Press TV on Thursday, Abdolmalek Rigi said that in a Dubai meeting with CIA agents, he was promised unlimited support that included a military base near the Iranian border equipped with weaponry and training facilities.

The Jundallah leader added that he was to meet a top US intelligence official at the US military base in Kyrgyzstan to work out the details of the support the US would provide for his group.

During their meetings with him, the US operatives insisted that Iran is their primary focus in the region, even more important than al-Qaeda and the Taliban, the terrorist leader stated.

Rigi added that the CIA agents also explained to him that since a US military attack on Iran would be very difficult, they planned to support all anti-Iran groups that have the capability of waging war inside Iran and destabilizing the country.”

On the capture of this most wanted CIA terrorist Iranian Foreign Ministry Spokesman Ramin Mehmanparast told the Islamic Republic News Agency (IRNA) that “ties between this [Rigi’s] terrorist group and security services of the so-called advocates of human rights including the US, Britain and certain other countries indicate that they are not honest about their claims of having respect for human rights.”

Iran’s Press TV News Service also reports that Rigi’s “crimes against humanity” include “mass murder, armed robbery, kidnappings, acts of sabotage and bombings inside Iran” including the killing of at least 40 people in the Iranian southeastern city of Pishin

Upon being briefed on Rigi’s confession of his being funded by the CIA, Iran’s Parliament Speaker Ali Larijani stated that the Obama administration should address Iranian concerns raised after the confessions made by Rigi and stated that “Rigi's confessions clearly disclose a close association between Jundallah, the US and NATO”.

The US has denied having links with Rigi's group Jundallah with Reuters News Service also reporting that Geoff Morrell, Pentagon press secretary, dismissed claims by the Iranian government that Rigi had been at an American military base just before his arrest. Morrell called the accusations of American involvement “nothing more than Iranian propaganda.”

Important to note about the Americans denial of involvement with Rigi is the fact that the propaganda they blame on Iran is, in fact, being used by them instead in order to incite their public into war against the Iranians, and as we can see evidenced in the report by Juan Cole titled “Ahmadinejad once again fails to call for the annihilation of Israel”, and which, in part, says:

“I saw Israeli Ambassador Michael Oren interviewed by Wolf Blitzer on CNN Friday afternoon. Oren said that Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad had called for the annihilation of Israel, and was therefore speaking of genocide.

It is dreary to see this constant drumbeat of dishonest propaganda. Whatever one thinks of Ahmadinejad or the Iranian regime, one should not misrepresent their statements, since that will lead to bad policy-making.

The Washington Post also wrote, "Ahmadinejad, a Holocaust denier, spoke of Israel's eventual "demise and annihilation". In fact, Ahmadinejad never mentioned Israel as a country at all, and spoke only about what he called the 'Zionist regime.' He favors an admittedly odd form of the 'one state solution' in which Palestinians and at least some Jews would all vote for the same government.

So this is what Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said Thursday at a press conference in Damascus:

“Iran, Syria, the Palestinian Resistance and Lebanon are ready to meet any conditions, and we hope that the enemies of the nations of the region will change their course and instead walk beside regional states in cooperation. Insofar as the Zionist regime threatens Lebanon and Syria and prominent personalities of these two countries every day, it must accept its end and grant in their entirety the rights of the Palestinian nation.”

That is, Ahmadinejad began by offering an olive branch to any former enemies that wanted to make peace. But he characterized the 'Zionist regime,' i.e. the Israeli government with its current ideology, as intrinsically belligerent, and insisted that this 'regime' must 'accept its own end' and grant Palestinians their full rights (presumably, citizenship and property rights, which they now lack).

Ahmadinejad seems to see Zionism as an ideology as essentially unwilling to allow Palestinian human rights, and so calls for it to acquiesce in its obsolescence.

Ahmadinejad did not mention Israel and did not call for any genocides, or anyone to be killed, or war. He asked Zionists to see that their ideology has no future. In the past he has compared his vision of the fall of what he calls the Zionist regime to the fall of the Soviet Union, which happened peacefully and with no annihilation of the population.”

American propaganda against Iran meant to further move their citizens to war against the Persian Nation also includes their lying to the American people about Iranian President Ahmadinejad’s election, and which we can see evidenced in the Consortium News Service report titled “Ahmadinejad Won, Get Over It!” and which says:

Despite what you may have read in the New York Times and the Washington Post, the available evidence is that Ahmadinejad did win last June’s presidential election and that efforts – embraced by nearly the entire U.S. news media – to oust him amount to yet another case of seeking the removal of a democratically chosen leader.

Though widely ignored by the major American news media, a recent study by the Program on International Policy Attitudes (PIPA) at the University of Maryland found little evidence to support allegations of fraud, nor to conclude that most Iranians view President Ahmadinejad as illegitimate.

PIPA analyzed multiple polls of the Iranian public from three different sources, including some before the June 12 election and some afterwards. The study found that in all the polls, a majority said they planned to vote for Ahmadinejad or had voted for him. The numbers ranged from 52 to 57 percent just before the election to 55 to 66 percent after the election.

“These findings do not prove that there were no irregularities in the election process,” said Steven Kull, director of PIPA. “But they do not support the belief that a majority rejected Ahmadinejad.”

To address the possibility that some poll data collected within Iran might have been fabricated, PIPA matched up patterns of responses collected inside Iran to those obtained by calling into Iran and found the patterns so similar “that it is hard to conclude that these data were fabricated,” Kull said.

Regarding the possibility that Iranians felt intimidated, PIPA noted that responses to other poll questions – such as criticism of the Islamic Guardian Council and the Interior Ministry – showed Iranians willing to express less than favorable views about powerful institutions.

And, further undercutting the U.S. news media’s cheerleading for “regime change” in Iran, PIPA’s analysis noted that none of the polls supported such a radical step. Large majorities – and even most supporters of opposition candidate Mir Hossein Mousavi – endorsed the Islamist character of the regime, such as allowing Islamic scholars to veto laws that violate principles from the Koran.”

Unfortunately, and as recent history has shown us all to well, the American people do not care to know the truth and remain content to believe the constant propaganda for war against Iran they are fed by their media organs and government “puppet master” officials, and all without their ever thinking of how catastrophic for them a war against the Persians would be.

But, and sadly, these Americans may soon get their wish for war as new reports from Iran are stating that President Ahmadinejad has ordered all of his Nation’s nuclear stockpile to be removed from their underground bunkers and placed in an above ground building in a move that has “stunned” the International Monitors overseeing Iran’s nuclear programme.

For Ahmadinejad’s exact reasoning for such a shocking move it is not in our knowing, other than to report the speculations of Western reporters, and which include:

“The strangest of the speculations — but the one that is being talked about most — is that Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps is inviting an attack to unify the country after eight months of street demonstrations that have pitted millions of Iranians against their government. As one senior European diplomat noted Thursday, an Israeli military strike might be the “best thing” for Iran’s leadership, because it would bring Iranians together against a national enemy.”

If these Western reports of Iran inviting an attack are true (and Iran had previously “invited” Israel’s Air Force to “come and visit their nuclear facilities”), then the Iranians have a willing partner for war, and as we can read in the report titled “Anglo-Israeli "Doomsday” War Scheme Advances” and which says:

“Sources close to the Israeli government have warned Executive Intelligence Review that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's inner cabinet is close to making a decision to launch a preventive strike against Iran's nuclear facilities.

The sources confirmed that the Obama Administration's national security team has delivered a series of strongly worded messages, warning Israel against any unilateral attacks on Iran. U.S. military leaders, as well as Defense Secretary Robert Gates, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, JCS Chairman Adm. Michael Mullen, National Security Advisor Gen. Jim Jones, and Vice President Joe Biden, all recognize that a military strike against Iran is the worst-case, last option, and that we are not even close to the point of having to make that decision. It is widely believed, including among Israeli planners, that Iran has a retaliatory asymmetric capability that would involve crippling the entire Persian Gulf oil flow, blowing out the entire world economy, if attacked.

Lyndon LaRouche warned that circles in London, including former Prime Minister Tony Blair, are the real potential architects of this "doomsday" scheme. It is those in London, who are desperate over the collapse of the entire British System, who may be contemplating an Israeli breakaway ally attack on Iran, that would bring on a planetary dark age.”

And to those Americans falsely believing that a war against Iran would be like those they have launched against Afghanistan and Iraq they should think again, especially in light of the recent war game conducted at the Saban Center for Middle East Policy, part of the Washington-based Brookings Institution that concluded:

“Here's a war game involving Iran, Israel and the U.S. that shows how unintended consequences can spin out of control:

With diplomacy failing and precious intelligence just received about two new secret Iranian nuclear facilities, Israel launches a pre-emptive strike against Tehran's nuclear complex. The strike is successful, wiping out six of Iran's key sites and setting back its suspected quest for a bomb by years.

But what happens next isn't pretty.

The U.S. president and his National Security Council try to keep the crisis from escalating. That sours U.S.-Israeli relations, already stressed by the fact that Israel didn't inform Washington in advance of the strike. The White House tries to open a channel for talks with Iran, but is rejected.

Instead, Iran attacks Israel, both directly and through its proxies in Lebanon and the Gaza Strip. It misinterprets U.S. actions as weakness and mines the Straits of Hormuz, the world's chief oil artery. That sparks a clash and a massive U.S. military reinforcement in the Persian Gulf.

The lesson is “once you start this, it's really hard to stop it,” said Kenneth Pollack, a former White House and CIA official who oversaw the simulation.

Pollack and others who participated in the day-long exercise late last year are quick to point out that war games are imperfect mirrors of reality. How Iran's notoriously opaque and fractious leadership would react in a real crisis is particularly hard to divine.

But the outcome underscores what diplomats, military officers and analysts have long said: even a "successful" airstrike on Iran's nuclear facilities - setting the program back by two to four years - could come at a tremendous, unpredictable cost.

“It's ... an option that has to be looked at very, very, very carefully," a senior European diplomat said Friday. "Because we know what the results could be, and they could be disastrous." He requested anonymity to speak more frankly on the sensitive issue.

Israel, which sees Iran as a direct threat, has refused to rule out military force, although officials there say they are counting for now on diplomatic pressure. There have even been hints from Sunni Arab states, particularly Saudi Arabia, that they would look the other way in the event of a strike on Shiite Iran, a historic adversary.

Yet one of the Brookings war game's major conclusions is that Israel could pay dearly for an attack on Iran.

By the end of the simulation, eight days after the fictitious Israeli strike, Israel's prime minister, under heavy domestic pressure, is forced to launch a 48-hour air blitz in southern Lebanon to halt rocket attacks from Hezbollah, the militant group sponsored by Iran. Israeli officials know the blitz is unlikely to achieve its objectives, and prepare a larger, costlier operation in Lebanon, including ground forces.

Israel's relations with the United States, its most important ally, are damaged. To avoid damaging them further, Israel bows to intense U.S. pressure and absorbs occasional missile strikes from Iran without retaliating.”

Now most ominously to note in these reports is the GRU stating that Iran’s “true reason” for removing their entire nuclear stockpile from underground is due to their fears of being hit by the American’s HAARP based earthquake weapon used to devastating effect upon the Americas with the latest to be hit being the South American Nation of Chile where new reports are showing that the “signature” startling cloud formations this weapon causes prior to these earthquakes did indeed appear. 

[Ed. Note: Western governments and their intelligence services actively campaign against the information found in these reports so as not to alarm their citizens about the many catastrophic Earth changes and events to come, a stance that the Sisters of Sorcha Faal strongly disagrees with in believing that it is every human beings right to know the truth.  Due to our missions conflicts with that of those governments, the responses of their ‘agents’ against us has been a longstanding misinformation/misdirection campaign designed to discredit and which is addressed in the report “Who Is Sorcha Faal?”.]

Feb. 28, 2010

www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1345.htm