Most Americans have absolutely no idea, but a very dark philosophy is spreading like wildfire among the global elite. This philosophy is an obsessive belief that humanity has become a cancer that is destroying the earth. (This philosophy is nothing new - even John Denver sang about it in Rocky Mountain High: "More people, more scars upon the land.") There are now large numbers of global leaders that are convinced that the exploding population of the world has become like a virus or a plague, and that it must be combated as such. In fact, it would be very difficult to understate just how obsessed many members of the global elite are with population control. The United Nations puts out position papers about it, universities have entire courses dedicated to it, radical population control advocates have been appointed to some of the highest political positions in the world, and some of the wealthiest people on the planet get together just to talk about it. Those who believe in this philosophy are constantly talking about the need for "increased access" to abortion, contraception and other "family planning" services. But even with all of their efforts, the population of the world is still expanding and those who believe in this population control philosophy are getting nervous.

So just who are these people among the global elite who believe so fervently in population control?  Some of the names you are about to read below might totally shock you. Many of them are some of the biggest names in the world. For example, Prince Charles gave a major speech just the other day in which he bemoaned the rapidly expanding world population: "I could have chosen Mumbai, Cairo or Mexico City; wherever you look, the world’s population is increasing fast. It goes up by the equivalent of the entire population of the United Kingdom every year. Which means that this poor planet of ours, which already struggles to sustain 6.8 billion people, will somehow have to support over 9 billion people within 50 years."

Many among the global elite believe that the growing world population is the number one problem facing the world. Many of them are absolutely convinced that overpopulation is the primary cause of "climate change", is ruining our environment, and threatens to turn the entire globe into one gigantic third world slum.

...most of them are in positions of power and influence where they can actually do quite a bit to advance their insidious agenda.

#1) The March 2009 U.N. Population Division policy brief....

"What would it take to accelerate fertility decline in the least developed countries?"

A better question would be “how far would they go” to accelerate fertility decline in the least developed countries. If they knew “what it would take,” would they be willing to implement the solution? Definitely. To these people, the ends justify the means. “It doesn’t matter how it gets done, as long as it gets done! Just do it!” They’re used to thinking of civilian deaths as “collateral damage.”

#2) Microsoft's Bill Gates....

"The world today has 6.8 billion people. That's heading up to about nine billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent."

Whoa-stop right there. Vaccines? He’s not talking about flu vaccines or anything that would supposedly keep people alive. They want to reduce the population. He’s talking about sterilization vaccines. Oh, but that would be completely voluntary, you say? Well, it hasn’t been in the past, for some third world countries. Yes, they’ve already done it. Would they do it here? If they could get away with it, yes.

#3) Barack Obama's top science advisor, John P. Holdren...

"A program of sterilizing women after their second or third child, despite the relatively greater difficulty of the operation than vasectomy, might be easier to implement than trying to sterilize men.

The development of a long-term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted under the skin and removed when pregnancy is desired opens additional possibilities for coercive fertility control. The capsule could be implanted at puberty and might be removable, with official permission, for a limited number of births."

Here you have the president’s science adviser, present day, in favor of “coercive fertility control.” In other words: forced. You could only have babies with official permission. They’re talking about it now, not “they might in the future,” but now.

#4) George W. Bush's science advisor Paul Ehrlich...

"Each person we add now disproportionately impacts on the environment and life-support systems of the planet."

That may or may not be true. Nevertheless, we can’t give government that kind of control over our lives, to forcibly implant us with sterilization capsules. You may think, oh, that wouldn’t be so bad. If so, you’ll probably go along with anything and are already a slave. Think about incrementalism. What will they force us to do next? Where will it end? Where do we draw the line? It should have been drawn a long time ago.

#5) U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg...

"Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of."

Oh, so now the truth comes out. Liberals, minorities: the government is NOT your friend.

#6) A United Nations Population Fund report entitled "Facing a Changing World: Women, Population and Climate"...

"No human is genuinely 'carbon neutral,' especially when all greenhouse gases are figured into the equation."

Yeah, the gasses from Al Gore alone are bad enough…

#7) David Rockefeller...

"The negative impact of population growth on all of our planetary ecosystems is becoming appallingly evident."

Is it really population growth, or is it corporate greed and irresponsibility?

#8) Jacques Cousteau...

"In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 people per day."

Prevent 350,000 from being conceived? That might be okay…wait! He said “eliminate.” He’s talking about wanting 350,000 people who are already born, to die.

#9) CNN Founder Ted Turner...

"A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal."

Why don’t you go first, Ted?

#10) Dave Foreman, Earth First Co-Founder...

"My three main goals would be to reduce human population to about 100 million worldwide, destroy the industrial infrastructure and see wilderness, with it’s full complement of species, returning throughout the world."

What would the world do without the snail darter and the spotted owl? Oh, what a tragedy!

#11) Prince Phillip, the Duke of Edinburgh...

"If I were reincarnated I would wish to be returned to earth as a killer virus to lower human population levels."

His friends and acquaintances should watch out – he has a heart full of murder.

#12) David Brower, first Executive Director of the Sierra Club...

"Childbearing [should be] a punishable crime against society, unless the parents hold a government license ... All potential parents [should be] required to use contraceptive chemicals, the government issuing antidotes to citizens chosen for childbearing."

Another advocate of forced sterilization. There are probably a lot of them. They’ve done it before in the U.S., remember? It hasn’t been that long since they quit doing it and apologized to their victims. They sterilized women in some states who made less than a B average in school.

#13) Planned Parenthood Founder Margaret Sanger...

"The most merciful thing that a family does to one of its infant members is to kill it."

I understand the desire to not bring a child into this harsh world, but this suggestion is immoral. How about just keeping your legs together. Think that might work?

#14) Planned Parenthood Founder Margaret Sanger. Woman, Morality, and Birth Control. New York: New York Publishing Company, 1922. Page 12...

"Birth control must lead ultimately to a cleaner race."

This woman was such a rabid eugenicist, Adolf Hitler was one of her admirers.

#15) Princeton philosopher Peter Singer...

"So why don’t we make ourselves the last generation on earth? If we would all agree to have ourselves sterilized then no sacrifices would be required — we could party our way into extinction!"

What do you expect from a man who publicly admits he has a perverse relationship with his dog? Peter Singer is infamous for his inethical behavior, yet he calls himself a bioethicist.

#16) Thomas Ferguson, former official in the U.S. State Department Office of Population Affairs...

"There is a single theme behind all our work–we must reduce population levels. Either governments do it our way, through nice clean methods, or they will get the kinds of mess that we have in El Salvador, or in Iran or in Beirut. Population is a political problem. Once population is out of control, it requires authoritarian government, even fascism, to reduce it…."

Revealing statement from an individual in such a position of power.

#17) Mikhail Gorbachev...

"We must speak more clearly about sexuality, contraception, about abortion, about values that control population, because the ecological crisis, in short, is the population crisis. Cut the population by 90% and there aren't enough people left to do a great deal of ecological damage."

He seems to just have a lot of hatred for people in general. I’ll bet his grandkids don’t visit very often. Probably afraid they’ll accidentally do some ecological damage, like step on an ant or knock over a lamp.

#18) John Guillebaud, professor of family planning at University College London...

"The effect on the planet of having one child less is an order of magnitude greater than all these other things we might do, such as switching off lights. An extra child is the equivalent of a lot of flights across the planet."

That may be true. When they start forcing it though, we could end up with a situation like in China, where female babies are killed or abandoned so they could try again for a boy.

#19) Professor of Biology at the University of Texas at Austin Eric R. Pianka...

"This planet might be able to support perhaps as many as half a billion people who could live a sustainable life in relative comfort. Human populations must be greatly diminished, and as quickly as possible to limit further environmental damage."

And as we all know, professors know everything, right?

#20) U.S. Secretary Of State Hillary Clinton...

"This year, the United States renewed funding of reproductive healthcare through the United Nations Population Fund, and more funding is on the way.  The U.S. Congress recently appropriated more than $648 million in foreign assistance to family planning and reproductive health programs worldwide. That’s the largest allocation in more than a decade – since we last had a Democratic president, I might add."

In other words, our taxes are paying for foreigners to get abortions.

#21) Clinton adviser Nina Fedoroff...

"We need to continue to decrease the growth rate of the global population; the planet can't support many more people."

More people mean less resources for her, and we can’t have that!

#22) The first of the "new 10 commandments" on the Georgia Guidestones...

"Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature."

What would you expect from a godless pagan? This is their mindset.

Aug. 12, 2010

lisat2.multiply.com/journal/item/480