A new report by the Security Council of the Russian Federation (SCRF) expressed “extreme shock” after evidence was presented that thousands of Americans are now begging President Obama not to kill them as the United States accelerates it push towards becoming the most powerful police state modern history has ever seen.

The evidence presented to the SCRF for this finding was a new petition to Obama from terrified American citizens on the official White House website posted this past week titled “Create a Do Not Kill List” which says:

“The New York Times reports that President Obama has created an official “kill list” that he uses to personally order the assassination of American citizens. Considering that the government already has a “Do Not Call” list and a “No Fly” list, we hereby request that the White House create a “Do Not Kill” list in which American citizens can sign up to avoid being put on the president’s “kill list” and therefore avoid being executed without indictment, judge, jury, trial or due process of law.”

The New York Times editorial cited by those Americans in their petition begging Obama not to kill them was titled “Too Much Power for a President” and began by stating:

“It has been clear for years that the Obama administration believes the shadow war on terrorism gives it the power to choose targets for assassination, including Americans, without any oversight. On Tuesday, The New York Times revealed who was actually making the final decision on the biggest killings and drone strikes: President Obama himself. And that is very troubling.”

According to the WSWS News Service, however, about this New York Times editorial it is stated:

“The article in America’s “newspaper of record” was not meant as an exposé of these war crimes or the president’s assertion of unchecked power to kill anyone he chooses. On the contrary, it was a sympathetic portrait written in close collaboration with administration officials. For the administration and the ruling class that it serves, such a demonstration of illegality is considered to be a political strength.

In regards to Anwar al-Awlaki—the New Mexican-born cleric incinerated along with another US-born man in a September 2011 drone attack in Yemen—the Times noted that Obama virtually boasted that his decision to order the execution of US citizens was “an easy one.”

 Knowing full well that the president has no legal power to assassinate US citizens who are not charged, let alone convicted, of a crime, the administration has concocted a pseudo-legal cover for its violation of the US Constitution. The Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel provided the president with a memo—which the administration has kept secret—justifying such an attack on the grounds that, as the Times reports, “while the Fifth Amendment’s guarantee of due process applied, it could be satisfied by internal deliberations in the executive branch.”

Glen Greenwald, one of the most highly respected of America’s constitutional lawyers, further warns that Obama, in an effort to limit the reporting of thousands of innocent civilians being killed by US drone strikes, has re-defined “militant” to mean “all military-age males in a strike zone.” And if that were frightening enough, Obama has further named the United States itself as a “strike/battle zone” allowing him to kill any American citizen in their own home he so chooses.

Making this situation even more dire for Americans, this report continues, are new reports emerging last week that the Obama regime is preparing to equip over 18,000 local US police departments with spy drones that can be fitted with weapons “at a moments notice” for use in domestic operations creating for these once free people a future of “robot assassins” and “spy aircraft.”

To the American people living under Obama, who London’s Daily Telegraph described this past week as a “ruthless slayer of terrorist suspects five months before he faces re-election,” their appears to be no respite as these beleaguered citizens are further being told to brace themselves for more warrantless FBI searches and are further being warned that their once free highway systems are now being turned into a “high tech prison grid.”

To how the Obama regime will justify itself when it begins assassinating American citizens in their own homes a further chilling clue was given this past week, and as we can, in part, read as reported by the PakAlert News Service in their article titled New Bill Would Make It Legal To Target Propaganda And “Psychological Operations” Directly At U.S. Citizens:

“An amendment that has been added to a new defense bill in Congress would make it legal to target propaganda and “psychological operations” directly at U.S. citizens.  The latest version of the National Defense Authorization Act would overturn the Smith-Mundt Act of 1948 and the Foreign Relations Authorization Act of 1987.  Those two laws essentially make it illegal for propaganda that is used to influence public opinion overseas to be targeted at U.S. citizens back here at home.  If those two laws are struck down, there will be essentially very few limits to what the U.S. government can do to shape our opinions.  The government would be able to bombard us with propaganda messages on television, on the radio, in our newspapers and on the Internet and there would not even be a requirement that those messages be true.”

To what has caused the once great United States to spiral into such a wicked and dangerous state where its citizens today cower in fear can, perhaps, be best summed up by one of their Founding Fathers, and second President, John Adams who warned all future generations of Americans: “Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”

June 7, 2012 © EU and US all rights reserved. Permission to use this report in its entirety is granted under the condition it is linked back to its original source at WhatDoesItMean.Com. Freebase content licensed under CC-BY and GFDL.

[Ed. Note: Western governments and their intelligence services actively campaign against the information found in these reports so as not to alarm their citizens about the many catastrophic Earth changes and events to come, a stance that the Sisters of Sorcha Faal strongly disagrees with in believing that it is every human beings right to know the truth.  Due to our missions conflicts with that of those governments, the responses of their ‘agents’ against us has been a longstanding misinformation/misdirection campaign designed to discredit and which is addressed in the report “Who Is Sorcha Faal?”.]

http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1585.htm