7-1-18

Hello Folks,

The national insane asylum once known as the United States has become so unhinged lately that Hollywood leftist-liberal elitist Bill Maher is now calling for a crippling US economic collapse to destroy President Trump—with Maher further proclaiming to his millions of viewers that “we’re not going to win the Supreme Court pick…I don’t know if we’re ever going to win another election, because I keep saying, and I truly believe, Trump  is going to go when he wants to go, and that includes even if he loses the 2020 election”—and whose wish for wholesale economic destruction to rain down upon his nation’s citizens is actually more preferable to the radioactive fallout imagined for them by left-wing Silicon Valley multi-billionaire Tom Steyer who is now calling for a nuclear war “to provide a real course correction to Trump”—but that prior to either of these things happening, at least to me, it seems logical that someone would explain to the American people the real truth about what’s going on there before their now underway civil war gets any worse.

So, and with no one else bothering to tell the truth anymore, please allow me a few minutes of your time today to tell you what’s really happening—and that I’ll begin by my 100% agreeing with the Sisters, who, in their report “As Their Democratic Party “Train To Power” Goes Off The Rails, Radical American Leftists Ignite Civil War”, correctly stated last week that the most significant event to note about the 2016 US presidential election wasn’t the election of Donald Trump, but the destruction of the Democratic Party.

 

American radical leftists carry symbolic coffin of Democratic Party to its grave

 

In one of the Washington Post’s rare, and nearly completely accurate articles about this—“The Democratic Party Unraveling Is Not Good For America”—also published this past week—they describe how the Democratic Party has disintegrated to such an extent, it can no longer be called a national political party as it’s being taken apart, piece by piece, by radically competing interests—best exampled by the global “Merchant of Misery” George Soros who has carved out a piece of the Democratic Party for himself so he can spend millions-of-dollars to get elected Democratic Party prosecutors throughout the United States—none of whom will defend the American people as Soros has found a new way to make money from personal-injury lawsuits through his Soros Fund Management that is pushing into a branch of litigation finance that few hedge funds have entered, with his family office now bankrolling a company that’s insidiously creating investment portfolios out of lawsuits. 

The most important part of the Democratic Party being broken off, though, is the American Civil Liberties Union—known as the ACLU—that was founded in 1920, and whose stated mission is “to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties guaranteed to every person in this country by the Constitution and laws of the United States”.

This past week, however, and for the first time in its 98 year history, the ACLU announced that it would no longer be fighting for free speech in America—and whose shocking decision to do so was based on Georgetown University Carmack Waterhouse Professor of Constitutional Law Louis Michael Seidman having published an article in the Columbia Law Review titled “Can Free Speech Be Progressive?”—and whose answer to his own question was a resounding “NO!”

 

 

To understand why the ACLU, along with other radical leftists in the fast disintegrating Democratic Party, are abandoning the defense of free speech in America, I’ve got to bring you back to 1971, when Robert Bork, the most prominent conservative law professor in the United States, who later became a Federal Judge and Supreme Court nominee, wrote the definitive document on the United States Constitution’s First Amendment titled “Neutral Principles and Some First Amendment Problems”—that was adopted as the standard to be used in all First Amendment cases in America, and whose basic narrow outlines for when the First Amendment could be used stated: “Constitutional protection should be accorded only to speech that is explicitly political…there is no basis for judicial intervention to protect any other form of expression, be it scientific, literary or that variety of expression we call obscene or pornographic”.

Knowing that this interpretation of the First Amendment spelled the certain death of all liberal-leftist causes the Democratic Party envisioned imposing upon the American people by judicial rulings, as they knew that their radical agenda would never pass muster in the voting booths, Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law Professor Martin Redish, also in 1971, fired back against Judge Bork with his article in the Georgetown Law Review titled “The First Amendment in the Marketplace: Commercial Speech and the Values of Free Expression”—and whose essence of was the proposing that First Amendment protection for “commercial speech” be fought for in the courts by leftists.

By 1976, two cases pitting Judge Bork’s and Professor Redish’s different interpretations of the First Amendment reached the United States Supreme Court—the ACLU supported case of Buckley v. Valeo, and the case of Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council championed by the leftist activist Ralph Nader—both of which saw the nearly entirely liberal US Supreme Court side with Professor Redish’s expanded, and never known in history before, interpretation of the First Amendment as protecting “commercial speech”—with the only dissent in these decisions coming from Justice William H. Rehnquist, the court’s most conservative member, whose warnings of what would happen if Judge Bork’s First Amendment interpretations were ignored—and that, with the benefit of over 40 years worth of hindsight, the failings to heed the warnings given by Justice Rehnquist now has ACLU Attorney Burt Neuborne declaring “I signed the brief in Buckley, I’m going to spend long amounts of time in purgatory”—and Ralph Nader, likewise, now declaring about his Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council case: “It was one of the biggest boomerangs in judicial cases ever”.

 

Former United States Supreme Court Chief Justice William Rehnquist shouts from his grave to the American leftists of today: “I told you so!”

 

As to why ACLU Attorney Neuborne fears purgatory, and Ralph Nader is tearfully watching in horror as this “big boomerang” smashes all liberal-leftist hopes of their having any kind of future, you should know that at the same these two 1976 United States Supreme Court rulings underpinned too numerous to mention radical-leftist agendas to be forced down the throats and into the lives of the American people, and that they’d never vote for if allowed to do so (same sex marriage, proliferation of pornography, unrestrained abortion of babies right up to the ninth month of living in their mothers’ wombs, etc.)—but that has now seen the nearly full decade of rule by a conservative majority ruled Supreme Court having turned this First Amendment “leftist logic” to their own advantage—to include their 2009 Citizens United decision declaring that corporations had a First Amendment right to give unlimited political campaign donations—and this past week’s Janus ruling that US federal and State government union workers had a First Amendment right not to pay union dues—that America’s unions have funneled into Democratic Party coffers for decades, but will no longer be able to do so.  

 

Conservative United States Supreme Court uses 1976 liberal interpretation of First Amendment to decimate American leftist political power

 

Now in this simple explanation I’ve given you of how the now fully conservative United States Supreme Court is slowly, but very surely, bringing America back to Judge Bork’s narrow interpretation of what the First Amendment was actually intended for (but that the New York Times comically calls the “Weaponization of the First Amendment”), you should understand why the liberal-leftists have their heads exploding because of Justice Anthony Kennedy announcing his retirement—and to such an extent that Hollywood radical Bill Maher is calling for the US to collapse in economic chaos, radical tech giant multi-billionaire Tom Steyer is calling for nuclear war, radical filmmaker Michael Moore is calling for 1 million people to surround Washington D.C. to keep the US Senate from confirming Justice Kennedy’s replacement, and NBC News reporter Taylor Cox openly calling for the genocide of all white Americans—with these being just a few examples of the hundreds I could give you on how many of these leftist-loonies have quit taking their much needed medication.  

 

 

This simple explanation I’ve given you, too, provides all the evidence you need to prove that these leftists’ hatred of President Trump would have been turned on any Republican Party conservative candidate who beat Hillary Clinton—after all, what did you think these radical leftists’ response would be to having their United States Supreme Court “toy” being taken away from them?  If you answer hysterical fits of rage and incoherence, you’re coming close to understanding how dangerous and unhinged they’re becoming!

To what the future holds, it’s important for you to know too, I’m literally begging each and every one of you to read Sister Ciara’s special report “Roaring Youth Of America Today Need Rapid Defense Against Liberal Lies And Deceit Before All Is Lost”—not only because it shows the “cycle of time” we’re now all living through, but calls YOU TO ACTION to protect the future that awaits if enough people stand up and support those of us, literally, standing as the last line of defense. 

And for those of you still looking down at the ground to keep from seeing the deadly storm gathering on the horizon heading right for you: 

Here’s a warning —in 1913, just a few years before the Russian Revolution, the Bolsheviks were a tiny group of radicals like you see in America today, four years later they had taken over the entire country—in 1928, the Nazi party was an obscure joke, winning a mere 2.6% of the votes in the German national election that year, not even five years later, though, Adolf Hitler was German chancellor and had been awarded supreme power by the Enabling Act of 1933—and right now, today, in South Africa—you know, that country that the “Merchant of Misery” George Soros has been destabilizing as he prepares for his massive land grab there—its over 4.4 million white citizens have just been warned by their radical leftist leader: “We have not called for the killing of white people…at least for now. I can’t guarantee the future”—with, no doubt, this white genocide being cheered by NBC News reporter Taylor Cox who just can’t for it to happen in America too.

So finally folks, and before it’s too late, can you please help us out, right now, by going below and giving us what you can so we on the front lines of this war can keep defending you?

Thank you for listening and aiding us in our hour of desperate need, and, as always too, please feel free to write me at sorchafaal@fastmail.fm with any comments/questions/suggestions, and remembering to put ATTN: BRIAN in the subject line.

All the best folks,

Brian

Webmaster

Paris

Fr.

http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index2596pl.htm