5-14-20

 

Editor's note:  ...  We, at CONTACT, would like to take a moment to PUBLICLY thank Sananda for his TRUE LIGHT AND LIGHTED WISDOM AND GENEROSITY IN SHARING SUCH TRUTH WITH US.  THANK YOU!

Part 1 of this series began in our 3/19/96 CONTACT on p. 28' Part 2 was on p. 29 of the 3/26/96 issue; Part 3 was on p. 15 of the 4/2/96 issue; Part 4 was on p. 5 of the 4/9/96 issue; Part 5 was on p. 11 of the 4/23/96 issue; Part 6 was on p. 13 of the 5/7/96 issue; Part 7 was on p. 14 of the 5/21/96 issue; Part 8 in this issue is the end of this series.

 

6/13/91 #3   SANANDA

 

WHICH: KINGDOM VISUALIZED OR ARMAGEDDON SCRIPT?

Visualization used for manipulation of external events can have some very present dangers.  This is aptly referred to as "sorcery".  Ones think it great insight and fun to play at witchery/sorcery as "white" vs. "black", etc.  I warn you, chelas, it is a dangerous game where YOU are "had" almost every time and not vice versa.

I am Esu Emmanuel Sananda (Jesus the Christ, as you ones have come to label my being).  I am come to speak of earthly things that you might be given into KNOWING and move out of the confusion of MAN'S OPINIONS AND ILL-INTERPRETATIONS.

Most speakers on these particular subjects of "Christianity", "New Age", New World Order", New Age Politics, etc., have what they believe

 

to be "good intent" but they are indeed "ignorant". Ignorance is defensible until it turns into refusal to consider that that which they might be experiencing is "ignorance".  I am going to currently skip through discussions at length, on such matters as public school prayers, and other Church/State situations for I wish to continue my subject of "visualization".  The contradiction is, as with all deceiving, so imperceptible in projection that you are manipulated into being unable to see any difference at all.

Let us look at something which was widely read, which was projected by Pat Robertson and co-workers.  This man is respected in the circles of evangelism on the TV and ran for the office of your Presidency.  But, what does he tell you?  He tells you that the Kingdom of God will not materialize unless you "visualize" it.

"Ever wonder what it would be like if the kingdom of God were realized on Earth beginning today?  How would you recognize it?  Would you feel comfortable in it?  Or do you suspect your life would have to change significantly? ....In The Secret Kingdom Pat Robertson and Bob Slosser let us peak into the invisible kingdom of God as portrayed in the Bible.  And then show that if it is to be implemented on Earth now, you and I will need to be involved in its visualization.  Our obedience to God's Word will determine how much of it will be implemented in our communities, our nation, and our world."

Wow!  And what if those projectors of their opinions and perceptions of "how it will be" are WRONG?  If you have visualized the incorrect picture and action, how will you know the difference when the real thing comes down?  That is exactly that which you have done!  There is no statement from me that says such a thing; there aren't even any scriptural requirements that it is necessary to fulfill Jesus' prayer "Thy Kingdom Come".  I can assure you, precious little friends, HIS KINGDOM will come with or without your visualization.  But it could well be that your visualization--deliberate disobedience of God's prohibition against sorcery--could prevent you from recognizing the Kingdom and actually cause failure in entering that Kingdom.

"Blessed are they that do His commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city.  For without are dogs, and sorcerers, and whoremongers, and murderers, and idolaters, and whosoever loveth and maketh a lie." Revelation 22:14-15.

Certainly seems to include "white", "black" and "multicolored" witches/sorcerers, to me.

Now, the next does not match Scripture.  But it does match a significant paragraph of The Armageddon Script by Peter LeMesurier.  LeMesurier also says, in effect, that visualization is necessary for the manifestation of the Kingdom--for the kingdom of their deliberately staged FALSE CHRIST.  The following is directly from Pat Robertson:

"In the meantime the new world-leader must prepare himself for his role.  He must study the scriptures and the Dead Sea Scrolls, immerse himself in current Jewish messianic expectations, thoroughly survey the general locality and familiarize himself with all the major prophecies and the best in New Age religious thought.  In short, he must create in his own mind a crystal-clear idea of the vision which he has to fulfill.  For only in this way can that vision be guaranteed to come into manifestation."

Dear ones, this says: "GOD DOES NOT KNOW HIS OWN PURPOSE!"  Where are you, chelas? Could it be that mortal man, Robertson, doesn't know his head from his toes?  He has just limited God of Infinity and Universal Creation into a set of human visualizations.  Is that what you want? God of ALL KNOWING--to fit the guidelines, instructions, actions and expectations of Pat Robertson, human politician?  As a matter of fact, it matters not even that which YOU want in the circumstance; much less that of an avowed political speaker.

Despite all these objections, I am told that Robertson's ministry has to be from God because it has "fruits".  WELL, I SUGGEST YOU REMEMBER THAT THERE ARE BOTH GOOD FRUITS AND BAD FRUITS AND THE SKIN OF THE FRUITS BEAR NOT SIGNS.  Dear ones, you must test your spiritual leadership against the WHOLE counsel of God--His WORD, rightly divided. "Fruits" alone are not enough--they must be GOOD fruits: I said that "...in that day many would say to me, 'Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in thy name and cast out devils in thy name?' "  And my reply?  "Depart from me ye that work iniquity, I never knew you."

 

NETWORKING "THE GLOBAL VISION"

"The Open Conspiracy must begin as a movement of explanation and propaganda."  H.G. Wells, The Open Conspiracy.

"It must be remembered that the forerunner of all movements which appear upon the physical plane is an educational propaganda....Disciples in these ashrams have been in training for nearly one hundred and fifty years to do this work.  Alice Ann Bailey, The Externalization Of The Hierarchy.

"We (himself and Donald Keys) have worked together through several decades to sound the alarms and to point to possible new directions."   Norman Cousins, introduction to Donald Keyes' Earth At Omega.

The world was to be prepared for the New Order, the New Religion, and the new "Messiah" in many ways--mental as well as physical.  Occult literature details this coming "New World Order" of "New Order" as a "Golden Age".  Conversely, the Bible describes it as a time of sorrow.  Detailed preparation for that "New World Order" is very much in process and all but fulfilled.  This portion will take a look at a few of the vehicles politically acculturating you for the New Order.  We will examine the possibility of their work being influenced by occultism (this is actually not a good term for use here, but you have no word which gives me necessary definition; I use it in the accepted meaning of witchcraft, sorcery, magic, incantation, etc.)

 

CLUB OF ROME'S GOALS FOR MANKIND

Two MEN, Aurelio Peccei and Alexander King, cofounded this influential network of financiers, industrialists, and scholars in the late 1960's.  A capable executive, Peccei served as Chief Executive Officer for the Olivetti Corporation and for Fiat Automobiles.  His writings clearly reflect an "occult" world view, if not totally "Satanic".  They also reflected biases against even the "orthodox" Christianity (as defined by a meaning of being based presumably on Christ, real or imagined).

The Club of Rome continues to work closely with a number of occult political action organizations including Planetary Citizens, the International Center for Integrative Studies (ICIS), Lucis Trust, and the Global Education Associates.  Indeed, its "Goals for Mankind" Report's United Nations' goals were submitted by Donald Keyes himself.  Keyes is an activist with Lucis Trust and a former administrator of that organization.  Peccei believed that orthodox religious beliefs were somewhat primitive:

"If the future was full of mystery, it was because it was shaped by the thought of the life beyond and the unquestioned belief that Hell and Heaven truly existed.  The future belonged to God.  Mortals would, according to the good or evil deeds of their lifetimes, either be rewarded by the Lord with unsurpassed bliss, or punished for eternity; the soul was all that mattered.  And so the human imagination created a host of spirits and deities to take control over mortal life."

No, not so--MAN created the heaven/hell projection as well as the other propositions above.  God only stated that the "soul alone" matters, so you can see that from a twisted, manipulated vision came an opposing and equally dangerous counter-vision.

I note herein, that Peccei probably didn't know the closeness of his proposals to Bible prophecy.  But judging from his associations, it is probable he did know that he was reflecting the occult-inspired organic world view.

"One of the greatest socio-political and economic differences between the future and the present is that the increasingly intertwined structures of the entire global system will produce A Progressive Convergence of the Futures of all Peoples.  All societies will be bound together ever more closely by a network of vital interlinkages, which will condition their relationships with each other for better or for worse.  Breaking these links will not longer be conceivable.  It would throw the whole system into chaos, which no one would want."

Peccei more than likely honestly thought this would usher in a time of peace and prosperity for life. But on close inspection, his proposals are more likely to usher Orwell's 1984 horrors than an age of peace, light, and love.  If these links of which he speaks are truly unbreakable, individual freedoms are very much a thing of the past.  I have deliberately worded this statement in this manner--for we KNOW that the full intent was present from the beginning, therefore, the question is: WHO GAVE THESE MEN THE FORMAT IN THE FIRST PLACE?

You must realize that Peccei's analysis justifies the establishment of a new universal religion:

"The institutionalization of faith...has not always had happy results....Certain points of doctrine...have been magnified, provoking schisms, apostasy, and the denunciation of what are claimed to be heresies.  The official truth...has become impossible to question: and in order that it never should be questioned, ignorance and even superstitions have occasionally been encouraged...These structural inflexibilities and doctrinal introversions have helped to keep the major religions static even when the winds of change blowing through society have made clear the need to move from one cultural epoch to another.  As a result, it is difficult even for their most sensitive and profound theologians and scholars to break out of a system frozen into formulations, reflecting the past, a system that cannot adapt itself or its doctrines to modern life....Religions now run the risk of becoming a timid rear guard, detached from the problems and aspirations of a bewildered and troubled humanity....And yet humanity ...has a PROFOUND NEED FOR SPIRITUALITY....The anguish within the churches, the call for a new ecumenism to free them from their narrow confines, the wide-spread interest in minor cults...and a return to a respect for Nature--an ecological respect this time--are all symptoms of this need...  They are encouraging symptoms.  For, Without a Sincere Spiritual Awakening, The Renaissance of our True Humanity Will Be Impossible."

 

I'm sorry, beloved readers, but animism and a repudiation of God's command for Man to take dominion over the planet are occult belief hallmarks.  Peccei also suggests that perhaps Man created God and not vice versa:

"We may also ask whether it was perhaps to justify our immense aspirations in our own eyes that we were led to conceive God, and thus to attain the privilege--alone among all forms of life--of entering into communion with Him: and even to go so far as to assert that the Almighty had chosen to create us in His own image.  Is not this anthropomorphism of the Creator, which is not exclusive to the Christian faith, in reality a form of deification of Man?"

Seems to me that these very men were "acting" in the capacity of God themselves.  Peccei was personally expressing a belief in an organic view of the universe.  Which is in itself wondrous indeed--that you are all parts of a whole.  The mystics will always foist enough truth off on you to hook you into the lie.  It comes forth in the New Agers as the popularization of "unity consciousness" without the slightest idea of what is meant by the very term.  These become catch-words and codes for group unification and recognition, just as "hardware" and "software" become a verbal language unto itself.

They project one statement and bear definition of an entirely different intent.  It is mirrored in the popularization of "unity consciousness" where they come to a "realization" that they are one with everything in the universe--up to and including God--and utilize every known type of mind-altering substance while doing so.  It is very nearly stating that "all is related to all" but overlooking entirely the MEANING of the latter.

The Club of Rome betrays its occultic mystic witch-craft orientation in its recommended goals for human beliefs:

1.   A world consciousness must be developed through which every individual realizes his role as a member of the world community.

2.   A new ethic in the use of material resources must be developed which will result in a style of life compatible with the coming age of scarcity.

3.   An attitude toward Nature must be developed based on harmony rather than conquest--only in this way can man apply in practice what is already accepted in theory...this is, that man is an integral part of Nature.

4.   If the human species is to survive, man must develop a sense of the identification with future generations and be ready to trade benefits to the next generations for the benefits to himself.  If each generation aims at the maximum good for itself, homo sapiens are as good as doomed.

You have to REALLY look inside and with utmost caution and discernment to catch the flaws within the above "ideal" presentation.  One blatant and glaring absence is any relationship in and within God.  All is limited to the very base "physical expression" of the human relative to a physical expression of a minute portion of Creation.

Then we come to the parting of the ways between "typical" Christians and Truth.  The orthodox come forth and denounce anyone who speaks a word such as "reincarnation" while at the same time, in the same breath, touts this wondrous experience of life after death.  If you have one you MUST have the other and likewise; if you do not have one, you CANNOT have the other.  Again I am going to quote something which is interesting in perception of one another:

"yet consider the transformation of earthly existence were reincarnation accepted into the soulstream of the global population as a guide by which to live.  Acutely aware of reaping harvest of past deeds while simultaneously sowing the seeds of future lives, most people would behave very differently.  Life on the planet would be overhauled, and hugely for the better.  Wars, crime, racism, nationalism, and sexual chauvinism would be radically diminished...The nagging fear of death would be eliminated and replaced with acceptance of the opportunity for transformation.  Doctors who strive to prolong life...would see themselves as sad clowns flaunting their ignorance of cosmic renewal...genetic engineering would be recognized by all as meddlesome and dangerous.  Care would be taken not to encourage the extinction of animal and plant species lest rungs be removed from the evolutionary ladder... Acceptance of reincarnation demands a complete overturning of prevailing attitudes inculcated by a civilization that has long over-identified with the body."

It is truly enough to break of the heart, for portions of the projection are worthy of changing the entire planet into oneness with God.  But you must remember--there is not intent of God in relationship to Man--but the premise that Man shall somehow become God in human form and control other Men and dictate all actions and thoughts.

OVERLOOK, FORGET OR ABANDON--GODMan continues to seek and seek that which is fulfilled somehow through the physical and through the hands of other Men.  While Man rewrites the rules and assumption, the commandments of God and The Creation are put aside, voted-in or out, stomped on, walked on, spit on and/or most certainly ignored.  YOU WILL NEVER FIND WHOLENESS, FULFILLMENT OR ANY LASTING EXPERIENCE UNTIL YOU RECOGNIZE GOD AND THE NEED FOR BALANCE WITH THAT ONENESS WITHIN CREATION.  I CARE NOT WHAT YOU CALL YOUR RELIGION.  IF IT IS OF THE HUMAN, IT WILL ALWAYS REMAIN OF THE PHYSICAL ASPECT, AND THAT IS A FLEETING EXPERIENCE AT BEST.

 

TEACHINGS OF TRUTH

I walked your roads, felt your pain and occasional joy (Man has little joy).  I appeared to do that which was, at the least, unusual--for the birds and little creatures would come to perch upon my being.  I experienced the glory of that communion and, when asked about these things, I efforted to explain.  This was not the "mortal self, the self you can "see", that is able to do these things.  It is a truer, deeper self.  It is what you know as God, God within you, within me; God the Omnipotent One working through the being, that does these things.  Of myself, the mortal self, I can do nothing.  It is only when I get rid of the outer entirely and let the actual, that which I AM, speak and work and let the great Love of God come forth that I did those things that were witnessed.

When we consider the possibilities, it becomes easy to see why Man becomes "victim" of the illusions of another for he is forever searching.  There seem to be great contradictions but those are the result of taking that which is desirable out of context and utilizing it in incorrect assumptions.  It returns to the lack of understanding of LIGHT.  There is difference in the "thinking" of Man and the "thinking" of Central God, and a great difference in the KNOWING.  One is a physical experience; the other is a soul energy experience.  One can affect the other but one can never BE the other.

 

TRANSFORMATION OF MAN

When Man shall at last know God, he shall then be transformed.

Dynamic knowledge of the Identity and Presence of God within the Soul of Man--and throughout all Nature is a necessary stage for the human race to attain before it is possible for him to build an enduring civilization of unity and brotherhood.

The only reason Man has never known God is because he is still in his intellectual infancy and his ideals and practices are still "pagan" and mostly barbarous.  I apologize to the ones labeled "pagan" for it is indeed a most stupid projection, not as the truth regarding those so labeled.

To know God, Man must know what Light is, and energy, magnetism, electricity, gravitation and God's processes in the building of bodies which manifest His Presence and His purposes.  And he must know the mysteries of life, death, and growth, and the seed into which even the giant oak disappears but still retains its identity.  And he must know how Man retains his identity when he also disappears.

No man has yet known these things.  The concepts of modern sages regarding them are totally unlike God's processes.  The conclusions of Man regarding them are the conclusions of his senses. His Mind has never yet pierced their illusions.  He still senses EFFECTS without knowing their CAUSE.

These things you shall be given to know, and when you comprehend them within your inner Self, you will then KNOW God.  If we are to change and reverse the path from the chaos back into order, transmutation need surely occur.  Transmutation needs but the comprehension of a few men of vision, men whose minds are not fixedly closed to make such a reality; I did not say "visualization" as sit and chant or picture a tree, etc.  I mean "of vision" in openness to see and hear that which flows within and not from the projections of another from without.

Transmutation is the simplest of all the principles of Nature; ten thousand times more simple than what is now being dangerously and expensively done.  The first step toward is to discover that matter and motion are tonal, and thoroughly controllable.  The elements are not substances.  They are but states of motion which can be controlled by knowledge and electric power.  The present concept, which makes it necessary to knock out an electron from one element to transmute it to another, is contrary to Nature's working.  No one would think of trying to knock out one part of a sound to make it into another sound, or to take an arm from a man to transmute him into a horse. This is what science is trying to do, however, by knocking an electron from mercury to produce gold. There are no electrons in the elements to knock out, in any case, as you shall be given to see.

Dharma, I have with me a "Master" of transmutation and alchemy.  I would like to share the forum, as we move through the next few portions, with Germain.  I ask that the length of his Journal be checked for I would guess that the following portions will run well over a hundred pages.  Germain can be as wordy as Hatonn and I realize we are efforting to keep these Journals at a reasonable length.

I believe what we shall do is simply close this portion and release you for this day for you have been long at the keyboard in any event.  Let us take council on our next move and we will begin in the morrow.

Dearest friends, if there is to be Balance achieved, you MUST come into the KNOWING.  Since there are only infinite cycles, you WILL come into the KNOWING.  The only thing in point is WHEN and HOW.  Would it not be wondrous to move from this chaos into the journey home so that the majority of the trip shall be delightful rather than according to visualization of a few men who have pronounced their mysticism upon you?  Allow us to rest and refresh and we shall look forward to meeting again tomorrow.

In love and compassion for the opening eyes and hearts,

I AM

 

 

---

Source:  CONTACT: THE PHOENIX PROJECT, May 28, 1996, Volume 13, Number 3, Pages 10-12.

http://www.phoenixarchives.com/contact/1996/0596/052896.pdf